Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?
The accuracy of a maxillomandibular relationship acquired by intraoral scanners (IOSs) has been previously analyzed; however, the impact of the interocclusal space on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship remains unknown. The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the in...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2024-08, Vol.132 (2), p.435-440 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 440 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 435 |
| container_title | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry |
| container_volume | 132 |
| creator | Revilla-León, Marta Gómez-Polo, Miguel Zeitler, Jonathan M. Barmak, Abdul B. Kois, John C. Pérez-Barquero, Jorge Alonso |
| description | The accuracy of a maxillomandibular relationship acquired by intraoral scanners (IOSs) has been previously analyzed; however, the impact of the interocclusal space on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship remains unknown.
The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of the interocclusal space (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 degrees of incisal opening in the articulator) on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an IOS.
Markers were attached to the first molars and canines of maxillary and mandibular diagnostic casts, which were mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator, and digital scans were acquired (TRIOS 4). Both digital scans were duplicated 100 times and distributed into 5 groups depending on the incisal pin opening in the articulator (n=20): 0 (Group 0), 1 (Group 1), 2 (Group 2), 3 (Group 3), and 4 degrees (Group 4). In Group 0 (control), the casts were maintained in maximum intercuspation (MIP) with the incisal pin of the articulator set at 0 degrees. Then, a bilateral virtual occlusal record was acquired and automatically processed by using the IOS software program. A laboratory scanner (Medit T500) was used to digitize the mounted casts. The same procedures were completed in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 but with the incisal pin set at 1, 2, 3, and 4 degrees respectively. The interlandmark distances were used to calculate the discrepancies between the control and groups tested. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise comparison Tukey HSD tests were used to inspect the data (α=.05).
The interocclusal space available when capturing the occlusal records affected the trueness of the maxillomandibular virtual relationship measured (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.004 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2734612942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022391322005649</els_id><sourcerecordid>2734612942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-357282d3e19dcf665c5f50a39cda7c9210cce8b81dc26b487c8811070b4f4d6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQhS1ERS-FV6iyZJPUP4njrAAVKEiVuoG1NRlPdH3l_GAnpX0DHoNn4cmacFu2Xc1o_M0c-RzGzgUvBBf64lBMcUyOhrmQXMqCNwXn5Qu2E7ypc21K8ZLt-PqSq0aoU_Y6pQPn3FS1eMVOlVZlU2m9Y78_jZSyeU8Z3IIP0AbK_DBTHBHDkiBkaQLcZl1YaFi7fyziEgHvs7H7-2cb9HDnQxh7GJxvlwAxixRg9uOQ9n7KEKZ5ieSyX37eZzBsEhHGuJ1HGAaK79-wkw5CoreP9Yz9-PL5--XX_Prm6tvlx-scpVFzrqpaGukUicZhp3WFVVdxUA06qLGRgiOSaY1wKHVbmhqNEYLXvC270ulOnbF3x7urfz8XSrPtfUIKAQYal2RlrUotZFPKFdVHFFerU6TOTtH3EO-t4HZLwR7sUwp2S8Hyxq4prIvnjxpL25P7v_Zk-wp8OAK0_vTWU7QJ_eau85Fwtm70z2k8AFEXoOI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734612942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Revilla-León, Marta ; Gómez-Polo, Miguel ; Zeitler, Jonathan M. ; Barmak, Abdul B. ; Kois, John C. ; Pérez-Barquero, Jorge Alonso</creator><creatorcontrib>Revilla-León, Marta ; Gómez-Polo, Miguel ; Zeitler, Jonathan M. ; Barmak, Abdul B. ; Kois, John C. ; Pérez-Barquero, Jorge Alonso</creatorcontrib><description>The accuracy of a maxillomandibular relationship acquired by intraoral scanners (IOSs) has been previously analyzed; however, the impact of the interocclusal space on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship remains unknown.
The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of the interocclusal space (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 degrees of incisal opening in the articulator) on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an IOS.
Markers were attached to the first molars and canines of maxillary and mandibular diagnostic casts, which were mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator, and digital scans were acquired (TRIOS 4). Both digital scans were duplicated 100 times and distributed into 5 groups depending on the incisal pin opening in the articulator (n=20): 0 (Group 0), 1 (Group 1), 2 (Group 2), 3 (Group 3), and 4 degrees (Group 4). In Group 0 (control), the casts were maintained in maximum intercuspation (MIP) with the incisal pin of the articulator set at 0 degrees. Then, a bilateral virtual occlusal record was acquired and automatically processed by using the IOS software program. A laboratory scanner (Medit T500) was used to digitize the mounted casts. The same procedures were completed in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 but with the incisal pin set at 1, 2, 3, and 4 degrees respectively. The interlandmark distances were used to calculate the discrepancies between the control and groups tested. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise comparison Tukey HSD tests were used to inspect the data (α=.05).
The interocclusal space available when capturing the occlusal records affected the trueness of the maxillomandibular virtual relationship measured (P<.001). Group 0 (135 μm) obtained the highest distortion, while Group 3 (73 μm) and Group 4 (71 μm) showed the lowest distortion. Additionally, the interocclusal space available (P<.001) impacted the precision of the maxillomandibular virtual relationship measured. Group 0 (111 μm) obtained the highest distortion, while Group 4 (precision mean value of 59 μm) had the lowest distortion among the groups tested.
The interocclusal space available when acquiring virtual bilateral occlusal records using the IOS tested impacted the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship. The smallest available interocclusal space tested (maximum intercuspation) showed the worst trueness and precision mean values, while the group with the largest interocclusal space available had the highest trueness and precision mean values among the groups studied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36349566</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Dental Articulators ; Dental Occlusion ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; In Vitro Techniques ; Jaw Relation Record - instrumentation ; Mandible - anatomy & histology ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Maxilla - anatomy & histology ; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging ; Models, Dental</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2024-08, Vol.132 (2), p.435-440</ispartof><rights>2022 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-357282d3e19dcf665c5f50a39cda7c9210cce8b81dc26b487c8811070b4f4d6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-357282d3e19dcf665c5f50a39cda7c9210cce8b81dc26b487c8811070b4f4d6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0355-9128</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36349566$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Revilla-León, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Polo, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeitler, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barmak, Abdul B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kois, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Barquero, Jorge Alonso</creatorcontrib><title>Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>The accuracy of a maxillomandibular relationship acquired by intraoral scanners (IOSs) has been previously analyzed; however, the impact of the interocclusal space on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship remains unknown.
The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of the interocclusal space (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 degrees of incisal opening in the articulator) on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an IOS.
Markers were attached to the first molars and canines of maxillary and mandibular diagnostic casts, which were mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator, and digital scans were acquired (TRIOS 4). Both digital scans were duplicated 100 times and distributed into 5 groups depending on the incisal pin opening in the articulator (n=20): 0 (Group 0), 1 (Group 1), 2 (Group 2), 3 (Group 3), and 4 degrees (Group 4). In Group 0 (control), the casts were maintained in maximum intercuspation (MIP) with the incisal pin of the articulator set at 0 degrees. Then, a bilateral virtual occlusal record was acquired and automatically processed by using the IOS software program. A laboratory scanner (Medit T500) was used to digitize the mounted casts. The same procedures were completed in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 but with the incisal pin set at 1, 2, 3, and 4 degrees respectively. The interlandmark distances were used to calculate the discrepancies between the control and groups tested. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise comparison Tukey HSD tests were used to inspect the data (α=.05).
The interocclusal space available when capturing the occlusal records affected the trueness of the maxillomandibular virtual relationship measured (P<.001). Group 0 (135 μm) obtained the highest distortion, while Group 3 (73 μm) and Group 4 (71 μm) showed the lowest distortion. Additionally, the interocclusal space available (P<.001) impacted the precision of the maxillomandibular virtual relationship measured. Group 0 (111 μm) obtained the highest distortion, while Group 4 (precision mean value of 59 μm) had the lowest distortion among the groups tested.
The interocclusal space available when acquiring virtual bilateral occlusal records using the IOS tested impacted the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship. The smallest available interocclusal space tested (maximum intercuspation) showed the worst trueness and precision mean values, while the group with the largest interocclusal space available had the highest trueness and precision mean values among the groups studied.</description><subject>Dental Articulators</subject><subject>Dental Occlusion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Jaw Relation Record - instrumentation</subject><subject>Mandible - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Maxilla - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Models, Dental</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1TAQhS1ERS-FV6iyZJPUP4njrAAVKEiVuoG1NRlPdH3l_GAnpX0DHoNn4cmacFu2Xc1o_M0c-RzGzgUvBBf64lBMcUyOhrmQXMqCNwXn5Qu2E7ypc21K8ZLt-PqSq0aoU_Y6pQPn3FS1eMVOlVZlU2m9Y78_jZSyeU8Z3IIP0AbK_DBTHBHDkiBkaQLcZl1YaFi7fyziEgHvs7H7-2cb9HDnQxh7GJxvlwAxixRg9uOQ9n7KEKZ5ieSyX37eZzBsEhHGuJ1HGAaK79-wkw5CoreP9Yz9-PL5--XX_Prm6tvlx-scpVFzrqpaGukUicZhp3WFVVdxUA06qLGRgiOSaY1wKHVbmhqNEYLXvC270ulOnbF3x7urfz8XSrPtfUIKAQYal2RlrUotZFPKFdVHFFerU6TOTtH3EO-t4HZLwR7sUwp2S8Hyxq4prIvnjxpL25P7v_Zk-wp8OAK0_vTWU7QJ_eau85Fwtm70z2k8AFEXoOI</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Revilla-León, Marta</creator><creator>Gómez-Polo, Miguel</creator><creator>Zeitler, Jonathan M.</creator><creator>Barmak, Abdul B.</creator><creator>Kois, John C.</creator><creator>Pérez-Barquero, Jorge Alonso</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0355-9128</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?</title><author>Revilla-León, Marta ; Gómez-Polo, Miguel ; Zeitler, Jonathan M. ; Barmak, Abdul B. ; Kois, John C. ; Pérez-Barquero, Jorge Alonso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-357282d3e19dcf665c5f50a39cda7c9210cce8b81dc26b487c8811070b4f4d6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Dental Articulators</topic><topic>Dental Occlusion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Jaw Relation Record - instrumentation</topic><topic>Mandible - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Maxilla - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Models, Dental</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Revilla-León, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Polo, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeitler, Jonathan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barmak, Abdul B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kois, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Barquero, Jorge Alonso</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Revilla-León, Marta</au><au>Gómez-Polo, Miguel</au><au>Zeitler, Jonathan M.</au><au>Barmak, Abdul B.</au><au>Kois, John C.</au><au>Pérez-Barquero, Jorge Alonso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>132</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>440</epage><pages>435-440</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>The accuracy of a maxillomandibular relationship acquired by intraoral scanners (IOSs) has been previously analyzed; however, the impact of the interocclusal space on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship remains unknown.
The purpose of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate the influence of the interocclusal space (0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 degrees of incisal opening in the articulator) on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an IOS.
Markers were attached to the first molars and canines of maxillary and mandibular diagnostic casts, which were mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator, and digital scans were acquired (TRIOS 4). Both digital scans were duplicated 100 times and distributed into 5 groups depending on the incisal pin opening in the articulator (n=20): 0 (Group 0), 1 (Group 1), 2 (Group 2), 3 (Group 3), and 4 degrees (Group 4). In Group 0 (control), the casts were maintained in maximum intercuspation (MIP) with the incisal pin of the articulator set at 0 degrees. Then, a bilateral virtual occlusal record was acquired and automatically processed by using the IOS software program. A laboratory scanner (Medit T500) was used to digitize the mounted casts. The same procedures were completed in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 but with the incisal pin set at 1, 2, 3, and 4 degrees respectively. The interlandmark distances were used to calculate the discrepancies between the control and groups tested. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and pairwise comparison Tukey HSD tests were used to inspect the data (α=.05).
The interocclusal space available when capturing the occlusal records affected the trueness of the maxillomandibular virtual relationship measured (P<.001). Group 0 (135 μm) obtained the highest distortion, while Group 3 (73 μm) and Group 4 (71 μm) showed the lowest distortion. Additionally, the interocclusal space available (P<.001) impacted the precision of the maxillomandibular virtual relationship measured. Group 0 (111 μm) obtained the highest distortion, while Group 4 (precision mean value of 59 μm) had the lowest distortion among the groups tested.
The interocclusal space available when acquiring virtual bilateral occlusal records using the IOS tested impacted the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship. The smallest available interocclusal space tested (maximum intercuspation) showed the worst trueness and precision mean values, while the group with the largest interocclusal space available had the highest trueness and precision mean values among the groups studied.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>36349566</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.004</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0355-9128</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3913 |
| ispartof | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2024-08, Vol.132 (2), p.435-440 |
| issn | 0022-3913 1097-6841 1097-6841 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2734612942 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Dental Articulators Dental Occlusion Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods In Vitro Techniques Jaw Relation Record - instrumentation Mandible - anatomy & histology Mandible - diagnostic imaging Maxilla - anatomy & histology Maxilla - diagnostic imaging Models, Dental |
| title | Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A57%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20available%20interocclusal%20space%20influence%20the%20accuracy%20of%C2%A0the%20maxillomandibular%20relationship%20captured%20with%20an%20intraoral%20scanner?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Revilla-Le%C3%B3n,%20Marta&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=132&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=440&rft.pages=435-440&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2734612942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734612942&rft_id=info:pmid/36349566&rft_els_id=S0022391322005649&rfr_iscdi=true |