What children do while they wait: The role of self-control strategies in delaying gratification

•Children exhibit different patterns of self-control behaviors while attempting to delay gratification.•Children who were able to regulate their anticipation towards the reward using levels of fidgeting and vocalization that aligned with their level of anticipation were able to delay successfully, while this was not the case for children whose anticipation was the predominant factor.•How children delay gratification plays a role in their self-regulation above and beyond their ability to delay or not. Self-control plays an essential role in children’s emotional and behavioral adjustment. A central behavioral indicator of self-control is the ability to delay gratification. Few studies have focused on understanding the heterogeneity of self-control behaviors that underlie children’s ability to delay gratification. Therefore, we examined the role of spontaneous self-control behaviors (fidgeting, vocalizations, and anticipation/attentional focus toward a reward) in relation to 5-year old children’s delay ability using Mischel’s delay task (N = 144; Mage = 5.4 years, SD = 0.29). Latent mixture modeling was used to derive three distinct classes of self-control behaviors observed during the delay task: (1) Passive (low fidgeting, low vocalizations, but moderate anticipation), (2) Active (moderate fidgeting, moderate vocalizations, but high anticipation), and (3) Disruptive (high fidgeting, high vocalizations, and high anticipation). Children in the Passive class were more likely to delay the full task time compared with children in the Active class (odds ratio = 1.50, 95 % confidence interval = 1.28–1.81). There were no other differences in delay ability by self-control class. Children whose level of fidgeting and vocalizations matched their level of anticipation (i.e., Passive and Disruptive regulators) were able to delay more successfully than children who were mostly driven by anticipation (Active regulators). Some variation in children’s delay ability and use of self-control strategies was explained by sociodemographic differences, specifically maternal age. Findings suggest probing processes underlying children’s self-control to identify potential targets for intervention.