Electrical stimulation or tacrolimus (FK506) alone enhances nerve regeneration and recovery after nerve surgery, while dual use reduces variance and combines strengths of each in promoting enhanced outcomes

Introduction/Aims Repaired nerve injuries can fail to achieve functional recovery. Therapeutic options beyond surgery, such as systemic tacrolimus (FK506) and electrical stimulation (E‐stim), can improve recovery. We tested whether dual administration of FK506 and E‐stim enhances regeneration and re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Muscle & nerve 2023-01, Vol.67 (1), p.78-87
Hauptverfasser: Marsh, Evan B., Schellhardt, Lauren, Hunter, Daniel A., Mackinnon, Susan E., Snyder‐Warwick, Alison K., Wood, Matthew D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction/Aims Repaired nerve injuries can fail to achieve functional recovery. Therapeutic options beyond surgery, such as systemic tacrolimus (FK506) and electrical stimulation (E‐stim), can improve recovery. We tested whether dual administration of FK506 and E‐stim enhances regeneration and recovery more than either therapeutic alone. Methods Rats were randomized to four groups: E‐stim, FK506, FK506 + E‐stim, and repair alone. All groups underwent tibial nerve transection and repair. Two sets of animals were created to measure outcomes of early nerve regeneration using nerve histology (n = 36) and functional recovery (n = 42) (21‐ and 42‐day endpoints, respectively). Functional recovery was measured by behavioral analyses (walking track and grid walk) and, at the endpoint, muscle mass and force. Results Dual E‐stim and FK506 administration produced histomorphometric measurements of nerve regeneration no different than either therapeutic alone. All treatments were superior to repair alone (FK506, P 
ISSN:0148-639X
1097-4598
DOI:10.1002/mus.27748