A new radiological parameter as a predictor of dysphagia based on oro-pharyngeal stenosis in a cohort of pediatric patients undergoing mal-reduced C1–2 pedicle screw fixation

Purpose C1 pedicle screw technique showed further advantages since it avoids the negative results from the sacrificed range of motion of the atlantooccipital joint compared to the occipitocervical fusion. However, some intractable complications are unavoidable. In the pediatric population, dysphagia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European spine journal 2022-12, Vol.31 (12), p.3402-3409
Hauptverfasser: Long, Gong, Yanfeng, Zhu, Haoning, Ma, Ping, Yi, Mingsheng, Tan, Zhiyuan, Fang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose C1 pedicle screw technique showed further advantages since it avoids the negative results from the sacrificed range of motion of the atlantooccipital joint compared to the occipitocervical fusion. However, some intractable complications are unavoidable. In the pediatric population, dysphagia after the atlantoaxial fixation can be accidentally serious. We aimed to determine the incidence of dysphagia in the pediatric population's cohort and its radiological predictor. Methods Between January 2010 and August 2018, this retrospective study included 42 pediatric patients with atlantoaxial dislocation due to trauma. They were followed up with an average duration of 8 years (range 5–18 years). Twenty-seven were males and 15 females with a mean age of 8.2 years (range 5–15 years) when undergoing operations. Patients were classified according to the presence of postoperative dysphagia according to the Bazaz dysphagia grading scale. The measurements, including pre- and postoperative CVT/NSL, O–C2, and C2–C7 sagittal angles, were performed. Results 26.2% of the patients (11/42) experienced postoperative dysphagia. A significant difference in the postoperative CVT/NSL (115.2 ± 13.2 vs.134.8 ± 17.3, P  = 0.002), ΔCVT/NSL (7.0 ± 11.2 vs. 20.3 ± 10.5, P  = 0.001), ΔO–C2 (− 3.2 ± 5.8 vs. 2.1 ± 5.1, P  = 0.026), postoperative nPAS (9.4 ± 3.7 vs. 12.6 ± 4.2, P  = 0.031) and ΔPAS (− 1.5 ± 4.1 vs. 2.0 ± 3.5, P  = 0.010) between dysphagia group and non-dysphagia group were found. Adjustment for age, gender, and BMI, the multivariate logistic analysis showed that ΔCVT/NSL 
ISSN:0940-6719
1432-0932
DOI:10.1007/s00586-022-07355-z