The phase structure of high-pressure-crystallized polyethylene
The phase structure of three linear polyethylene (PE) samples, crystallized from the melt at high pressure, has been studied by electron microscopy and high-resolution solid-state 13C n.m.r. spectroscopy. In general, three phases are required to account for the n.m.r. data: the lamellar crystalline...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Polymer (Guilford) 1994-01, Vol.35 (6), p.1171-1181 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The phase structure of three linear polyethylene (PE) samples, crystallized from the melt at high pressure, has been studied by electron microscopy and high-resolution solid-state
13C n.m.r. spectroscopy. In general, three phases are required to account for the n.m.r. data: the lamellar crystalline phase, the crystalline-amorphous interphase and the amorphous phase. All three are present in high-molecular-weight samples but there is no amorphous phase for samples with lower molecular weights and large lamellar thicknesses. The amorphous phase appears when the ratio of the number-averaged extended molecular chain length (
X
n) to the number-averaged crystalline stem length (
L
n) exceeds two. High-pressure-crystallized materials differ from those crystallized at atmospheric pressure in that the mass fraction of the amorphous phase does not exceed 0.05; the thickness of the crystalline-amorphous interphase reaches 8.0 nm for material with the highest molecular weight, a value which is considerably larger than those reported for samples crystallized at atmospheric pressure or which have been estimated theoretically. Extraordinarily long
13C spin-lattice relaxation times have been found: a figure of
T
1C = 7000 s, higher than any previously reported, for the highest-molecular-weight sample is still less than would be expected from the large lamellar thickness. In consequence, this relaxation is attributed to molecular motion in the vicinity of the crystal defects; this is in addition to
13C spin diffusion to the non-crystalline region, occurring with a shorter
T
1C. The discrepancy between the observed and calculated values of
T
1C increases as the molecular weight falls in those samples for which the crystal stem lengths exceed the extended molecular lengths. For these, the unexpectedly shorter
T
1C is attributed to defects such as methyl end-groups within the crystalline regions. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0032-3861 1873-2291 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90008-6 |