Predicting Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Rectal Cancer Using Machine Learning: Evaluation of MRI-Based Radiomic and Clinical Models

Background Radiomics is an approach to medical imaging that quantifies the features normally translated into visual display. While both radiomic and clinical markers have shown promise in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) for rectal cancer, the interrelationship is not...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2023, Vol.27 (1), p.122-130
Hauptverfasser: Peterson, Kent J., Simpson, Matthew T., Drezdzon, Melissa K., Szabo, Aniko, Ausman, Robin A., Nencka, Andrew S., Knechtges, Paul M., Peterson, Carrie Y., Ludwig, Kirk A., Ridolfi, Timothy J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Radiomics is an approach to medical imaging that quantifies the features normally translated into visual display. While both radiomic and clinical markers have shown promise in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) for rectal cancer, the interrelationship is not yet clear. Methods A retrospective, single-institution study of patients treated with nCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer was performed. Clinical and radiomic features were extracted from electronic medical record and pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. Machine learning models were created and assessed for complete response and positive treatment effect using the area under the receiver operating curves. Results Of 131 rectal cancer patients evaluated, 68 (51.9%) were identified to have a positive treatment effect and 35 (26.7%) had a complete response. On univariate analysis, clinical T-stage (OR 0.46, p  = 0.02), lymphovascular/perineural invasion (OR 0.11, p  = 0.03), and statin use (OR 2.45, p  = 0.049) were associated with a complete response. Clinical T-stage (OR 0.37, p  = 0.01), lymphovascular/perineural invasion (OR 0.16, p  = 0.001), and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen level (OR 0.28, p  = 0.002) were significantly associated with a positive treatment effect. The clinical model was the strongest individual predictor of both positive treatment effect (AUC = 0.64) and complete response (AUC = 0.69). The predictive ability of a positive treatment effect increased by adding tumor and mesorectal radiomic features to the clinical model (AUC = 0.73). Conclusions The use of a combined model with both clinical and radiomic features resulted in the strongest predictive capability. With the eventual goal of tailoring treatment to the individual, both clinical and radiologic markers offer insight into identifying patients likely to respond favorably to nCRT.
ISSN:1091-255X
1873-4626
DOI:10.1007/s11605-022-05477-9