Exposure to secondhand aerosol from electronic cigarettes at homes: A real-life study in four European countries

Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use emits potentially hazardous compounds and deteriorates indoor air quality. Home is a place where e-cigarettes may frequently be used amid its increasing prohibition in public places. This study assessed the real-life scenario of bystanders' exposure to sec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2023-01, Vol.854, p.158668, Article 158668
Hauptverfasser: Amalia, Beladenta, Fu, Marcela, Tigova, Olena, Ballbè, Montse, Paniello-Castillo, Blanca, Castellano, Yolanda, Vyzikidou, Vergina K., O'Donnell, Rachel, Dobson, Ruaraidh, Lugo, Alessandra, Veronese, Chiara, Pérez-Ortuño, Raúl, Pascual, José A., Cortés, Nuria, Gil, Fernando, Olmedo, Pablo, Soriano, Joan B., Boffi, Roberto, Ruprecht, Ario, Ancochea, Julio, López, Maria J., Gallus, Silvano, Vardavas, Constantine, Semple, Sean, Fernández, Esteve
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use emits potentially hazardous compounds and deteriorates indoor air quality. Home is a place where e-cigarettes may frequently be used amid its increasing prohibition in public places. This study assessed the real-life scenario of bystanders' exposure to secondhand e-cigarette aerosol (SHA) at home. A one-week observational study was conducted within the TackSHS project in four countries (Greece, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) in 2019 including: 1) homes of e-cigarette users living together with a non-user/non-smoker; and 2) control homes with no smokers nor e-cigarette users. Indoor airborne nicotine, PM2.5, and PM1.0 concentrations were measured as environmental markers of SHA. Biomarkers, including nicotine and its metabolites, tobacco-specific nitrosamines, propanediol, glycerol, and metals were measured in participants' saliva and urine samples. E-cigarette use characteristics, such as e-cigarette refill liquid's nicotine concentration, e-cigarette type, place of e-cigarette use at home, and frequency of ventilation, were also collected. A total of 29 e-cigarette users' homes and 21 control homes were included. The results showed that the seven-day concentrations of airborne nicotine were quantifiable in 21 (72.4 %) out of 29 e-cigarette users' homes; overall, they were quite low (geometric mean: 0.01 μg/m3; 95 % CI: 0.01–0.02 μg/m3) and were all below the limit of quantification in control homes. Seven-day concentrations of PM2.5 and PM1.0 in e-cigarette and control homes were similar. Airborne nicotine and PM concentrations did not differ according to different e-cigarette use characteristics. Non-users residing with e-cigarette users had low but significantly higher levels of cotinine, 3′-OH-cotinine and 1,2-propanediol in saliva, and cobalt in urine than non-users living in control homes. In conclusion, e-cigarette use at home created bystanders' exposure to SHA regardless of the e-cigarette use characteristics. Further studies are warranted to assess the implications of SHA exposure for smoke-free policy. [Display omitted] •This multi-country study assessed exposure to e-cigarette aerosol at home.•E-cigarette use emits pollutants and may impair indoor air quality.•Airborne nicotine was quantifiable in 21 out of 29 e-cigarette users' homes.•E-cigarette non-users living with e-cigarette users absorbed e-cigarette emission.•Further studies are needed to guide smoke-free policy in private settings.
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158668