The ridge line of left pulmonary vein isolation from left atrial appendage can subsequently increase the completion rate of the mitral isthmus block line

Background and objectives Mitral isthmus (MI) ablation for mitral flutter is technically difficult, and incomplete block line is not uncommon. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the ridge line of left pulmonary vein isolation (LPVI) from left atrial appendage (LAA) on comple...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2023-04, Vol.66 (3), p.673-681
Hauptverfasser: Hori, Hitomi, Kaneko, Shinji, Fujita, Masaya, Nagai, Shin, Ito, Ryota, Shirai, Yoshinori, Adachi, Kentaro, Suzuki, Noriyuki, Suzuki, Junya, Kondo, Kiyota, Yamauchi, Ryota, Haga, Tomoaki, Tatami, Yosuke, Ohashi, Taiki, Kubota, Ryuji, Shinoda, Masanori, Tanaka, Akihito, Inden, Yasuya, Murohara, Toyoaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and objectives Mitral isthmus (MI) ablation for mitral flutter is technically difficult, and incomplete block line is not uncommon. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the ridge line of left pulmonary vein isolation (LPVI) from left atrial appendage (LAA) on completion rate of mitral isthmus (MI) block line and recurrence rate of atrial tachycardia (AT) or atrial flutter (AFL) after the first MI ablation. Methods We identified 611 patients who underwent first MI ablation for mitral flutter during the study period. Finally, 559 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the method of ridge line ablation of LPVI (LAA group, n  = 467, conventional group, n  = 92). Outcome measures were the completion of MI block line by first MI ablation, the recurrence of AT/AFL, and repeat MI ablation after the first MI ablation. Results The first MI block line completion rate was significantly higher in the LAA group than the conventional group (95% vs. 85%, p  
ISSN:1383-875X
1572-8595
DOI:10.1007/s10840-022-01382-y