Reflective Functioning and Its Potential to Moderate the Efficacy of Manualized Psychodynamic Therapies Versus Other Treatments for Borderline Personality Disorder
Background: Impaired reflective functioning (RF) is common among patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) has been demonstrated to improve RF compared to other common BPD treatments. If RF reflects a treatment mechanism for TFP, differences in pre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 2023-01, Vol.91 (1), p.50-56 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Impaired reflective functioning (RF) is common among patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) has been demonstrated to improve RF compared to other common BPD treatments. If RF reflects a treatment mechanism for TFP, differences in pretreatment RF may also serve as a prescriptive factor for TFP's effects. Method: A total of 194 patients with BPD were randomized across two clinical trials to receive TFP (n = 83), dialectical behavior therapy (DBT; n = 31), supportive psychodynamic therapy (SPT; n = 28), or an enhanced treatment as usual (eTAU; n = 52). A mixed-effects model was used to examine whether baseline RF interacted with treatment condition to predict slopes of change in the Brief Symptom Inventory, the shared symptom outcome between trials. Moderation of changes in RF was also examined. Results: Treatment interacted with baseline RF to predict BSI slopes (p = .011). In TFP/SPT, RF did not predict outcomes, β = −0.00, p = .973, while higher RF was associated with relatively better outcomes in DBT/eTAU, β = −0.54, p < .001. Patients with poor RF (scores of 0/1) benefitted more from TFP/SPT, while patients with relatively ordinary RF (score of 4) had better outcomes in DBT/eTAU. Treatment effects on RF change were also moderated by baseline RF (p = .014), such that TFP improved RF most strongly among poor RF patients, SPT only among very poor RF patients, and DBT/eTAU not at all. Discussion: Low RF may reflect a deficit that may be targeted by TFP and other manualized psychodynamic treatments for BPD, which may be especially helpful among patients presenting with low RF.
What is the public health significance of this article?
Reflective functioning (RF) is an important facet of social cognition and self-knowledge, which is sometimes disrupted among patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). Across two randomized clinical trials, patients entering treatment with poor RF had relatively better symptom and RF outcomes in manualized psychodynamic therapies (transference-focused psychotherapy; supportive dynamic therapy) compared to dialectical behavior therapy and clinical care in the community, and vice versa for normal RF. Manualized psychodynamic therapies that focus on improving RF may be an especially good first option for treating BPD among patients with poor RF, while patients with normative RF may be able to more easily take advantage of other treatment modalities. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-006X 1939-2117 |
DOI: | 10.1037/ccp0000760 |