Right Bundle Branch and Bifascicular Blocks: Insensitive Prognostic Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction

The clinical significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or bifascicular block (BFB) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is uncertain. RBBB was found in 211 of 7,626 patients (2.8%), presenting to the ED (emergency department) with chest pain, of which 18 (8.5%) also had acute c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current problems in cardiology 2023-01, Vol.48 (1), p.101418-101418, Article 101418
Hauptverfasser: Rector, Graham, Triska, Jeffrey, Ajene, George, Wang, Ann, Haddadin, Faris, Jabri, Ahmad, Alam, Mahboob, Birnbaum, Yochai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101418
container_issue 1
container_start_page 101418
container_title Current problems in cardiology
container_volume 48
creator Rector, Graham
Triska, Jeffrey
Ajene, George
Wang, Ann
Haddadin, Faris
Jabri, Ahmad
Alam, Mahboob
Birnbaum, Yochai
description The clinical significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or bifascicular block (BFB) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is uncertain. RBBB was found in 211 of 7,626 patients (2.8%), presenting to the ED (emergency department) with chest pain, of which 18 (8.5%) also had acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Incidences of ACS were not significantly different between new or presumed new RBBB and prior known RBBB or new or presumed new BFB and prior known BFB. In 2 patients, baseline ST-segment depression in leads V1-3 masked anterior ST-elevation detected on electrocardiogram (ECG). In opposition to the guidelines, the presence of RBBB or BFB does not appear to offer any clinical utility when evaluating patients with suspected AMI. Patients with suspected AMI who present with RBBB and any ST-elevation in leads V1-3 should be considered for emergent coronary angiography rather than RBBB alone.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101418
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2720429975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0146280622003152</els_id><sourcerecordid>2720429975</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ba5e2d0b58f22a66c573743051605a6bed34d161ba91d5ee1b713aacc429534a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFvEzEQhS0EEiHwG_CRywbbu_Ym3JKKlkqtQFV7tmbHs63D1g62t1L_fR2CuPY0ozfvjWY-xj5LsZJCmq_7FR4QkvNxWimh1FHt5PoNW0jd6saotXjLFlUzTW3Ne_Yh570QUm2kWbBw4-8fCt_NwU3EdwkCPnAIju_8CBk9zhMkvpsi_s7f-GXIFLIv_on4rxTvQ8zFY5WdRygxZT7GxLc4F-LXz_HvWTDV-QgJi4_hI3s3wpTp07-6ZHfn32_PfjRXPy8uz7ZXDbbdujQDaFJODHo9KgXGoO7bvmuFlkZoMAO5tnPSyAE20mkiOfSyBUDs1Ea3HbRL9uW095Din5lysY8-I00TBIpztqpXono3va7W_mTFFHNONNpD8o-Qnq0U9kjY7u1_wvZI2J4I1-T2lKT6yZOnZCswCkjOJ8JiXfSv7ngBDMqJxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2720429975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Right Bundle Branch and Bifascicular Blocks: Insensitive Prognostic Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rector, Graham ; Triska, Jeffrey ; Ajene, George ; Wang, Ann ; Haddadin, Faris ; Jabri, Ahmad ; Alam, Mahboob ; Birnbaum, Yochai</creator><creatorcontrib>Rector, Graham ; Triska, Jeffrey ; Ajene, George ; Wang, Ann ; Haddadin, Faris ; Jabri, Ahmad ; Alam, Mahboob ; Birnbaum, Yochai</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or bifascicular block (BFB) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is uncertain. RBBB was found in 211 of 7,626 patients (2.8%), presenting to the ED (emergency department) with chest pain, of which 18 (8.5%) also had acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Incidences of ACS were not significantly different between new or presumed new RBBB and prior known RBBB or new or presumed new BFB and prior known BFB. In 2 patients, baseline ST-segment depression in leads V1-3 masked anterior ST-elevation detected on electrocardiogram (ECG). In opposition to the guidelines, the presence of RBBB or BFB does not appear to offer any clinical utility when evaluating patients with suspected AMI. Patients with suspected AMI who present with RBBB and any ST-elevation in leads V1-3 should be considered for emergent coronary angiography rather than RBBB alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-2806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-6280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101418</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Current problems in cardiology, 2023-01, Vol.48 (1), p.101418-101418, Article 101418</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ba5e2d0b58f22a66c573743051605a6bed34d161ba91d5ee1b713aacc429534a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ba5e2d0b58f22a66c573743051605a6bed34d161ba91d5ee1b713aacc429534a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4476-7994</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146280622003152$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rector, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triska, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajene, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddadin, Faris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jabri, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alam, Mahboob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birnbaum, Yochai</creatorcontrib><title>Right Bundle Branch and Bifascicular Blocks: Insensitive Prognostic Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction</title><title>Current problems in cardiology</title><description>The clinical significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or bifascicular block (BFB) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is uncertain. RBBB was found in 211 of 7,626 patients (2.8%), presenting to the ED (emergency department) with chest pain, of which 18 (8.5%) also had acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Incidences of ACS were not significantly different between new or presumed new RBBB and prior known RBBB or new or presumed new BFB and prior known BFB. In 2 patients, baseline ST-segment depression in leads V1-3 masked anterior ST-elevation detected on electrocardiogram (ECG). In opposition to the guidelines, the presence of RBBB or BFB does not appear to offer any clinical utility when evaluating patients with suspected AMI. Patients with suspected AMI who present with RBBB and any ST-elevation in leads V1-3 should be considered for emergent coronary angiography rather than RBBB alone.</description><issn>0146-2806</issn><issn>1535-6280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFvEzEQhS0EEiHwG_CRywbbu_Ym3JKKlkqtQFV7tmbHs63D1g62t1L_fR2CuPY0ozfvjWY-xj5LsZJCmq_7FR4QkvNxWimh1FHt5PoNW0jd6saotXjLFlUzTW3Ne_Yh570QUm2kWbBw4-8fCt_NwU3EdwkCPnAIju_8CBk9zhMkvpsi_s7f-GXIFLIv_on4rxTvQ8zFY5WdRygxZT7GxLc4F-LXz_HvWTDV-QgJi4_hI3s3wpTp07-6ZHfn32_PfjRXPy8uz7ZXDbbdujQDaFJODHo9KgXGoO7bvmuFlkZoMAO5tnPSyAE20mkiOfSyBUDs1Ea3HbRL9uW095Din5lysY8-I00TBIpztqpXono3va7W_mTFFHNONNpD8o-Qnq0U9kjY7u1_wvZI2J4I1-T2lKT6yZOnZCswCkjOJ8JiXfSv7ngBDMqJxA</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Rector, Graham</creator><creator>Triska, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Ajene, George</creator><creator>Wang, Ann</creator><creator>Haddadin, Faris</creator><creator>Jabri, Ahmad</creator><creator>Alam, Mahboob</creator><creator>Birnbaum, Yochai</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4476-7994</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>Right Bundle Branch and Bifascicular Blocks: Insensitive Prognostic Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction</title><author>Rector, Graham ; Triska, Jeffrey ; Ajene, George ; Wang, Ann ; Haddadin, Faris ; Jabri, Ahmad ; Alam, Mahboob ; Birnbaum, Yochai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ba5e2d0b58f22a66c573743051605a6bed34d161ba91d5ee1b713aacc429534a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rector, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triska, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ajene, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddadin, Faris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jabri, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alam, Mahboob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birnbaum, Yochai</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current problems in cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rector, Graham</au><au>Triska, Jeffrey</au><au>Ajene, George</au><au>Wang, Ann</au><au>Haddadin, Faris</au><au>Jabri, Ahmad</au><au>Alam, Mahboob</au><au>Birnbaum, Yochai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Right Bundle Branch and Bifascicular Blocks: Insensitive Prognostic Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction</atitle><jtitle>Current problems in cardiology</jtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>101418</spage><epage>101418</epage><pages>101418-101418</pages><artnum>101418</artnum><issn>0146-2806</issn><eissn>1535-6280</eissn><abstract>The clinical significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or bifascicular block (BFB) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is uncertain. RBBB was found in 211 of 7,626 patients (2.8%), presenting to the ED (emergency department) with chest pain, of which 18 (8.5%) also had acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Incidences of ACS were not significantly different between new or presumed new RBBB and prior known RBBB or new or presumed new BFB and prior known BFB. In 2 patients, baseline ST-segment depression in leads V1-3 masked anterior ST-elevation detected on electrocardiogram (ECG). In opposition to the guidelines, the presence of RBBB or BFB does not appear to offer any clinical utility when evaluating patients with suspected AMI. Patients with suspected AMI who present with RBBB and any ST-elevation in leads V1-3 should be considered for emergent coronary angiography rather than RBBB alone.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101418</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4476-7994</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-2806
ispartof Current problems in cardiology, 2023-01, Vol.48 (1), p.101418-101418, Article 101418
issn 0146-2806
1535-6280
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2720429975
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title Right Bundle Branch and Bifascicular Blocks: Insensitive Prognostic Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A27%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Right%20Bundle%20Branch%20and%20Bifascicular%20Blocks:%20Insensitive%20Prognostic%20Indicators%20for%20Acute%20Myocardial%20Infarction&rft.jtitle=Current%20problems%20in%20cardiology&rft.au=Rector,%20Graham&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=101418&rft.epage=101418&rft.pages=101418-101418&rft.artnum=101418&rft.issn=0146-2806&rft.eissn=1535-6280&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101418&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2720429975%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2720429975&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0146280622003152&rfr_iscdi=true