Right Bundle Branch and Bifascicular Blocks: Insensitive Prognostic Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction

The clinical significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or bifascicular block (BFB) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is uncertain. RBBB was found in 211 of 7,626 patients (2.8%), presenting to the ED (emergency department) with chest pain, of which 18 (8.5%) also had acute c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current problems in cardiology 2023-01, Vol.48 (1), p.101418-101418, Article 101418
Hauptverfasser: Rector, Graham, Triska, Jeffrey, Ajene, George, Wang, Ann, Haddadin, Faris, Jabri, Ahmad, Alam, Mahboob, Birnbaum, Yochai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The clinical significance of right bundle branch block (RBBB) or bifascicular block (BFB) in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is uncertain. RBBB was found in 211 of 7,626 patients (2.8%), presenting to the ED (emergency department) with chest pain, of which 18 (8.5%) also had acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Incidences of ACS were not significantly different between new or presumed new RBBB and prior known RBBB or new or presumed new BFB and prior known BFB. In 2 patients, baseline ST-segment depression in leads V1-3 masked anterior ST-elevation detected on electrocardiogram (ECG). In opposition to the guidelines, the presence of RBBB or BFB does not appear to offer any clinical utility when evaluating patients with suspected AMI. Patients with suspected AMI who present with RBBB and any ST-elevation in leads V1-3 should be considered for emergent coronary angiography rather than RBBB alone.
ISSN:0146-2806
1535-6280
DOI:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2022.101418