d‐mannosuria levels measured 1 h after d‐mannose intake can select out favorable responders: A pilot study

Background d‐mannose is used as preventive measure against recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs). We studied d‐mannosuria after a challenge test to identify favorable responders that could be targeted for long‐term preventive therapy. Material and Methods Following institutional review board ap...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurourology and urodynamics 2023-01, Vol.42 (1), p.49-55
Hauptverfasser: Fan, Ethan, Dashti, Marjan, Fuentes, Jorge, Reitzer, Larry, Christie, Alana L., Zimmern, Philippe E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background d‐mannose is used as preventive measure against recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTIs). We studied d‐mannosuria after a challenge test to identify favorable responders that could be targeted for long‐term preventive therapy. Material and Methods Following institutional review board approval, women attending a specialized tertiary care center urology clinic with a history of RUTIs were invited to participate by providing a urine sample (baseline), followed by the intake of home‐dose d‐mannose, and a second urine sample 1 h later (post). Urine samples were processed according to a d‐mannosuria assay technique reported previously by our group. d‐mannose concentrations were normalized to urinary creatinine. Results From July 2020 to March 2021, 26 patients met study criteria. Thirteen had a lower or unchanged ratio of baseline to post d‐mannose, whereas 13 were responders. Among 19 taking 2 g, 12 had a lower or unchanged trend and 7 were responders with >20% increase in the d‐mannose/creatinine ratio. Comparison of urinary baseline d‐mannose/creatinine ratios was significantly different between the responder (mean = 0.337 ± 0.158) and nonresponder (mean = 0.692 ± 0.444; p = 0.016) groups. Urinary post d‐mannose/creatinine ratios did not significantly differ between the two groups (p = 0.46). d‐mannose‐naïve patients had few responders, and age and urinary creatinine did not affect the findings. Conclusion This preliminary study on d‐mannose challenge tests indicates a urine response if urinary d‐mannose/creatinine ratio is low, which it was in some women with a history of RUTIs.
ISSN:0733-2467
1520-6777
DOI:10.1002/nau.25059