Economic impacts of carbon capture and storage on the steel industry–A hybrid energy system model incorporating technological change

•Economic impacts of carbon capture and storage (CCS) are examined.•A hybrid energy system model is used to comprehensively explore CCS cost reduction.•CCS cost reduction and its macroeconomic effects are analyzed.•CCS cost reduction mitigates steel production and GDP loss from CCS adoption.•CCS can...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied energy 2022-07, Vol.317, p.119208, Article 119208
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Hwarang, Lee, Jeongeun, Koo, Yoonmo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 119208
container_title Applied energy
container_volume 317
creator Lee, Hwarang
Lee, Jeongeun
Koo, Yoonmo
description •Economic impacts of carbon capture and storage (CCS) are examined.•A hybrid energy system model is used to comprehensively explore CCS cost reduction.•CCS cost reduction and its macroeconomic effects are analyzed.•CCS cost reduction mitigates steel production and GDP loss from CCS adoption.•CCS can be economically feasible in the long term. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is necessary to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that cannot be mitigated using other reduction options. However, the high cost of CCS raises doubts about its economic feasibility. This study analyzes CCS cost reduction and its macroeconomic effects and shows that CCS can be economically feasible in the long term. This study incorporates technology learning into a hybrid energy system model and investigates its impact on the economic feasibility of CCS in the Korean steel industry. The hybrid model integrates a bottom-up energy system model and a computable general equilibrium model and overcomes the limitations of employing independent models in exploring technology learning. According to the model, in 2050, the CCS unit cost decreases by 64% when the learning rate is 20%. Due to this cost reduction, the steel industry’s additional capital and labor costs resulting from CCS adoption decrease by 60%. Moreover, although CCS adoption and diffusion reduce steel production, 60% of this production loss can be mitigated by CCS cost reduction. The cost reduction also helps to reduce the GDP loss resulting from CCS adoption by 0.3 %p.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119208
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2718235913</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0306261922005736</els_id><sourcerecordid>2718235913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ad65acf180187ca7c3729be0243fd7206c6303ab1b2146c078b2811910590b373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1O3TAQhS1UJC7QV0Bessnt2ObmZwdClFZC6qZdW85kkuurxA62b6XsuuoL8IY8SU1T1l2NZnTO0ZyPsSsBWwGi_HTYmpkchWHZSpByK0QjoT5hG1FXsmiEqD-wDSgoC1mK5oydx3gAACkkbNjvB_TOTxa5nWaDKXLfczSh9S6POR0DceM6HpMPZiCez2lPeSUauXXdMaawvP56ueP7pQ224-snPC5ZMvHJd3916MOcA5J1A0-Ee-dHP1g0I8e9cQNdstPejJE-_psX7Mfnh-_3X4qnb49f7--eClRSpcJ05c5gL2rI3dBUqCrZtATyRvVdJaHEUoEyrWiluCkRqrqVdeYhYNdAqyp1wa7X3Dn45yPFpCcbkcbROPLHqGUlaql2jVBZWq5SDD7GQL2eg51MWLQA_QZeH_Q7eP0GXq_gs_F2NVIu8tNS0BEtOaTOBsKkO2__F_EHbDuStg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718235913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic impacts of carbon capture and storage on the steel industry–A hybrid energy system model incorporating technological change</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lee, Hwarang ; Lee, Jeongeun ; Koo, Yoonmo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hwarang ; Lee, Jeongeun ; Koo, Yoonmo</creatorcontrib><description>•Economic impacts of carbon capture and storage (CCS) are examined.•A hybrid energy system model is used to comprehensively explore CCS cost reduction.•CCS cost reduction and its macroeconomic effects are analyzed.•CCS cost reduction mitigates steel production and GDP loss from CCS adoption.•CCS can be economically feasible in the long term. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is necessary to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that cannot be mitigated using other reduction options. However, the high cost of CCS raises doubts about its economic feasibility. This study analyzes CCS cost reduction and its macroeconomic effects and shows that CCS can be economically feasible in the long term. This study incorporates technology learning into a hybrid energy system model and investigates its impact on the economic feasibility of CCS in the Korean steel industry. The hybrid model integrates a bottom-up energy system model and a computable general equilibrium model and overcomes the limitations of employing independent models in exploring technology learning. According to the model, in 2050, the CCS unit cost decreases by 64% when the learning rate is 20%. Due to this cost reduction, the steel industry’s additional capital and labor costs resulting from CCS adoption decrease by 60%. Moreover, although CCS adoption and diffusion reduce steel production, 60% of this production loss can be mitigated by CCS cost reduction. The cost reduction also helps to reduce the GDP loss resulting from CCS adoption by 0.3 %p.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-2619</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9118</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>capital ; Carbon capture and storage ; carbon sequestration ; Computable general equilibrium model ; cost effectiveness ; economic feasibility ; energy ; Energy system model ; greenhouse gases ; Hybrid energy system model ; industry ; labor ; macroeconomics ; steel ; Technological change ; Technology learning</subject><ispartof>Applied energy, 2022-07, Vol.317, p.119208, Article 119208</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ad65acf180187ca7c3729be0243fd7206c6303ab1b2146c078b2811910590b373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ad65acf180187ca7c3729be0243fd7206c6303ab1b2146c078b2811910590b373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261922005736$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hwarang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeongeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Yoonmo</creatorcontrib><title>Economic impacts of carbon capture and storage on the steel industry–A hybrid energy system model incorporating technological change</title><title>Applied energy</title><description>•Economic impacts of carbon capture and storage (CCS) are examined.•A hybrid energy system model is used to comprehensively explore CCS cost reduction.•CCS cost reduction and its macroeconomic effects are analyzed.•CCS cost reduction mitigates steel production and GDP loss from CCS adoption.•CCS can be economically feasible in the long term. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is necessary to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that cannot be mitigated using other reduction options. However, the high cost of CCS raises doubts about its economic feasibility. This study analyzes CCS cost reduction and its macroeconomic effects and shows that CCS can be economically feasible in the long term. This study incorporates technology learning into a hybrid energy system model and investigates its impact on the economic feasibility of CCS in the Korean steel industry. The hybrid model integrates a bottom-up energy system model and a computable general equilibrium model and overcomes the limitations of employing independent models in exploring technology learning. According to the model, in 2050, the CCS unit cost decreases by 64% when the learning rate is 20%. Due to this cost reduction, the steel industry’s additional capital and labor costs resulting from CCS adoption decrease by 60%. Moreover, although CCS adoption and diffusion reduce steel production, 60% of this production loss can be mitigated by CCS cost reduction. The cost reduction also helps to reduce the GDP loss resulting from CCS adoption by 0.3 %p.</description><subject>capital</subject><subject>Carbon capture and storage</subject><subject>carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Computable general equilibrium model</subject><subject>cost effectiveness</subject><subject>economic feasibility</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>Energy system model</subject><subject>greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hybrid energy system model</subject><subject>industry</subject><subject>labor</subject><subject>macroeconomics</subject><subject>steel</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Technology learning</subject><issn>0306-2619</issn><issn>1872-9118</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1O3TAQhS1UJC7QV0Bessnt2ObmZwdClFZC6qZdW85kkuurxA62b6XsuuoL8IY8SU1T1l2NZnTO0ZyPsSsBWwGi_HTYmpkchWHZSpByK0QjoT5hG1FXsmiEqD-wDSgoC1mK5oydx3gAACkkbNjvB_TOTxa5nWaDKXLfczSh9S6POR0DceM6HpMPZiCez2lPeSUauXXdMaawvP56ueP7pQ224-snPC5ZMvHJd3916MOcA5J1A0-Ee-dHP1g0I8e9cQNdstPejJE-_psX7Mfnh-_3X4qnb49f7--eClRSpcJ05c5gL2rI3dBUqCrZtATyRvVdJaHEUoEyrWiluCkRqrqVdeYhYNdAqyp1wa7X3Dn45yPFpCcbkcbROPLHqGUlaql2jVBZWq5SDD7GQL2eg51MWLQA_QZeH_Q7eP0GXq_gs_F2NVIu8tNS0BEtOaTOBsKkO2__F_EHbDuStg</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Lee, Hwarang</creator><creator>Lee, Jeongeun</creator><creator>Koo, Yoonmo</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Economic impacts of carbon capture and storage on the steel industry–A hybrid energy system model incorporating technological change</title><author>Lee, Hwarang ; Lee, Jeongeun ; Koo, Yoonmo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-ad65acf180187ca7c3729be0243fd7206c6303ab1b2146c078b2811910590b373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>capital</topic><topic>Carbon capture and storage</topic><topic>carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Computable general equilibrium model</topic><topic>cost effectiveness</topic><topic>economic feasibility</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>Energy system model</topic><topic>greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hybrid energy system model</topic><topic>industry</topic><topic>labor</topic><topic>macroeconomics</topic><topic>steel</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Technology learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hwarang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeongeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Yoonmo</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Hwarang</au><au>Lee, Jeongeun</au><au>Koo, Yoonmo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic impacts of carbon capture and storage on the steel industry–A hybrid energy system model incorporating technological change</atitle><jtitle>Applied energy</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>317</volume><spage>119208</spage><pages>119208-</pages><artnum>119208</artnum><issn>0306-2619</issn><eissn>1872-9118</eissn><abstract>•Economic impacts of carbon capture and storage (CCS) are examined.•A hybrid energy system model is used to comprehensively explore CCS cost reduction.•CCS cost reduction and its macroeconomic effects are analyzed.•CCS cost reduction mitigates steel production and GDP loss from CCS adoption.•CCS can be economically feasible in the long term. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is necessary to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that cannot be mitigated using other reduction options. However, the high cost of CCS raises doubts about its economic feasibility. This study analyzes CCS cost reduction and its macroeconomic effects and shows that CCS can be economically feasible in the long term. This study incorporates technology learning into a hybrid energy system model and investigates its impact on the economic feasibility of CCS in the Korean steel industry. The hybrid model integrates a bottom-up energy system model and a computable general equilibrium model and overcomes the limitations of employing independent models in exploring technology learning. According to the model, in 2050, the CCS unit cost decreases by 64% when the learning rate is 20%. Due to this cost reduction, the steel industry’s additional capital and labor costs resulting from CCS adoption decrease by 60%. Moreover, although CCS adoption and diffusion reduce steel production, 60% of this production loss can be mitigated by CCS cost reduction. The cost reduction also helps to reduce the GDP loss resulting from CCS adoption by 0.3 %p.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119208</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-2619
ispartof Applied energy, 2022-07, Vol.317, p.119208, Article 119208
issn 0306-2619
1872-9118
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2718235913
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects capital
Carbon capture and storage
carbon sequestration
Computable general equilibrium model
cost effectiveness
economic feasibility
energy
Energy system model
greenhouse gases
Hybrid energy system model
industry
labor
macroeconomics
steel
Technological change
Technology learning
title Economic impacts of carbon capture and storage on the steel industry–A hybrid energy system model incorporating technological change
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T15%3A08%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20impacts%20of%20carbon%20capture%20and%20storage%20on%20the%20steel%20industry%E2%80%93A%20hybrid%20energy%20system%20model%20incorporating%20technological%20change&rft.jtitle=Applied%20energy&rft.au=Lee,%20Hwarang&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=317&rft.spage=119208&rft.pages=119208-&rft.artnum=119208&rft.issn=0306-2619&rft.eissn=1872-9118&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119208&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2718235913%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718235913&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0306261922005736&rfr_iscdi=true