Simulating Polyproline II-Helix-Rich Peptides with the Latest Kirkwood–Buff Force Field: A Direct Comparison with AMBER and CHARMM

We simulated the dynamics of a set of peptides characterized by ensembles rich in PPII-helical content, to assess the ability of the most recent Kirkwood–Buff force field (KBFF20) to sample this conformational peculiarity. KBFF has been previously shown to capably reproduce experimental dimensions o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of physical chemistry. B 2022-10, Vol.126 (40), p.7833-7846
Hauptverfasser: McIvor, Jordan A. P., Larsen, Danaé S., Mercadante, Davide
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We simulated the dynamics of a set of peptides characterized by ensembles rich in PPII-helical content, to assess the ability of the most recent Kirkwood–Buff force field (KBFF20) to sample this conformational peculiarity. KBFF has been previously shown to capably reproduce experimental dimensions of disordered proteins, while being limited in confidently sampling structured proteins. Further development of the force field bridged this gap. It is however still unknown what are the main differences between KBFF and AMBER/CHARMM force fields. A direct comparison is now possible as both AMBER/CHARMM force fields have been used to sample peptides rich in PPII-helical content. We found that KBFF20 samples’ PPII-helical content qualitatively matches both AMBER and CHARMM force fields, with the main difference being the KBFF ability to populate the αR region of the Ramachandran plot in the set of simulated peptides. Overall, KBFF20 is a well-balanced force field, able to sample the dynamics of both structured and unstructured proteins.
ISSN:1520-6106
1520-5207
DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c03837