2 bladder, or not 2 bladder? That is the question
Radial artery occlusion remains an unsolved problem with radial access even when patent hemostasis technique is used. Ulnar compression during radial artery patent hemostasis further decreases radial artery occlusion and is recognized as a radial access "best practice". In this study ulnar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2022-09, Vol.100 (3), p.392-394 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 394 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 392 |
container_title | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Davis, Monique G. Blankenship, James C. |
description | Radial artery occlusion remains an unsolved problem with radial access even when patent hemostasis technique is used.
Ulnar compression during radial artery patent hemostasis further decreases radial artery occlusion and is recognized as a radial access "best practice".
In this study ulnar compression with a 2‐bladder band decreased radial occlusion rates compared to conventional patent hemostasis with a 1‐bladder band and may offer an elegant solution to the problem of how to achieve ulnar compression. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ccd.30375 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2712844582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2712009378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c165t-e51a2a721bfbbcba0d70574beb608c8a462ffba58e371e22331b7e8cb922c7d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAi4JbM5PNJnsSKX5BwUsFbyHJZumW7aYm24P_3u22ePA0w_DwzsxDyDWwGTCGD85VM864FCdkAgIxk1h8nR57KPPinFyktGaMlQWWEwJIbWuqysd7GiLtQk__Jo90uTI9bRLtV55-73zqm9BdkrPatMlfHeuUfL48L-dv2eLj9X3-tMgcFKLPvACDRiLY2lpnDaskEzK33hZMOWXyAuvaGqE8l-AROQcrvXK2RHSyUnxKbg-52xjG3XrTJOfb1nQ-7JJGCajyXCgc0Jt_6DrsYjdcN1LDr1zuA-8OlIshpehrvY3NxsQfDUzv5elBnh7l8V_lXl8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2712009378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>2 bladder, or not 2 bladder? That is the question</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Davis, Monique G. ; Blankenship, James C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Monique G. ; Blankenship, James C.</creatorcontrib><description>Radial artery occlusion remains an unsolved problem with radial access even when patent hemostasis technique is used.
Ulnar compression during radial artery patent hemostasis further decreases radial artery occlusion and is recognized as a radial access "best practice".
In this study ulnar compression with a 2‐bladder band decreased radial occlusion rates compared to conventional patent hemostasis with a 1‐bladder band and may offer an elegant solution to the problem of how to achieve ulnar compression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30375</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Compression ; Hemostasis ; Occlusion</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2022-09, Vol.100 (3), p.392-394</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c165t-e51a2a721bfbbcba0d70574beb608c8a462ffba58e371e22331b7e8cb922c7d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4966-533X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Monique G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankenship, James C.</creatorcontrib><title>2 bladder, or not 2 bladder? That is the question</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><description>Radial artery occlusion remains an unsolved problem with radial access even when patent hemostasis technique is used.
Ulnar compression during radial artery patent hemostasis further decreases radial artery occlusion and is recognized as a radial access "best practice".
In this study ulnar compression with a 2‐bladder band decreased radial occlusion rates compared to conventional patent hemostasis with a 1‐bladder band and may offer an elegant solution to the problem of how to achieve ulnar compression.</description><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Hemostasis</subject><subject>Occlusion</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAi4JbM5PNJnsSKX5BwUsFbyHJZumW7aYm24P_3u22ePA0w_DwzsxDyDWwGTCGD85VM864FCdkAgIxk1h8nR57KPPinFyktGaMlQWWEwJIbWuqysd7GiLtQk__Jo90uTI9bRLtV55-73zqm9BdkrPatMlfHeuUfL48L-dv2eLj9X3-tMgcFKLPvACDRiLY2lpnDaskEzK33hZMOWXyAuvaGqE8l-AROQcrvXK2RHSyUnxKbg-52xjG3XrTJOfb1nQ-7JJGCajyXCgc0Jt_6DrsYjdcN1LDr1zuA-8OlIshpehrvY3NxsQfDUzv5elBnh7l8V_lXl8A</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Davis, Monique G.</creator><creator>Blankenship, James C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-533X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>2 bladder, or not 2 bladder? That is the question</title><author>Davis, Monique G. ; Blankenship, James C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c165t-e51a2a721bfbbcba0d70574beb608c8a462ffba58e371e22331b7e8cb922c7d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Hemostasis</topic><topic>Occlusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Monique G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankenship, James C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Monique G.</au><au>Blankenship, James C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>2 bladder, or not 2 bladder? That is the question</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>392</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>392-394</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><abstract>Radial artery occlusion remains an unsolved problem with radial access even when patent hemostasis technique is used.
Ulnar compression during radial artery patent hemostasis further decreases radial artery occlusion and is recognized as a radial access "best practice".
In this study ulnar compression with a 2‐bladder band decreased radial occlusion rates compared to conventional patent hemostasis with a 1‐bladder band and may offer an elegant solution to the problem of how to achieve ulnar compression.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ccd.30375</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-533X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-1946 |
ispartof | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2022-09, Vol.100 (3), p.392-394 |
issn | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2712844582 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Compression Hemostasis Occlusion |
title | 2 bladder, or not 2 bladder? That is the question |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A17%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=2%20bladder,%20or%20not%202%20bladder?%20That%20is%20the%20question&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Davis,%20Monique%20G.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=392&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=392-394&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.30375&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2712009378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2712009378&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |