2 bladder, or not 2 bladder? That is the question

Radial artery occlusion remains an unsolved problem with radial access even when patent hemostasis technique is used. Ulnar compression during radial artery patent hemostasis further decreases radial artery occlusion and is recognized as a radial access "best practice". In this study ulnar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2022-09, Vol.100 (3), p.392-394
Hauptverfasser: Davis, Monique G., Blankenship, James C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 394
container_issue 3
container_start_page 392
container_title Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
container_volume 100
creator Davis, Monique G.
Blankenship, James C.
description Radial artery occlusion remains an unsolved problem with radial access even when patent hemostasis technique is used. Ulnar compression during radial artery patent hemostasis further decreases radial artery occlusion and is recognized as a radial access "best practice". In this study ulnar compression with a 2‐bladder band decreased radial occlusion rates compared to conventional patent hemostasis with a 1‐bladder band and may offer an elegant solution to the problem of how to achieve ulnar compression.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ccd.30375
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2712844582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2712009378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c165t-e51a2a721bfbbcba0d70574beb608c8a462ffba58e371e22331b7e8cb922c7d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAi4JbM5PNJnsSKX5BwUsFbyHJZumW7aYm24P_3u22ePA0w_DwzsxDyDWwGTCGD85VM864FCdkAgIxk1h8nR57KPPinFyktGaMlQWWEwJIbWuqysd7GiLtQk__Jo90uTI9bRLtV55-73zqm9BdkrPatMlfHeuUfL48L-dv2eLj9X3-tMgcFKLPvACDRiLY2lpnDaskEzK33hZMOWXyAuvaGqE8l-AROQcrvXK2RHSyUnxKbg-52xjG3XrTJOfb1nQ-7JJGCajyXCgc0Jt_6DrsYjdcN1LDr1zuA-8OlIshpehrvY3NxsQfDUzv5elBnh7l8V_lXl8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2712009378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>2 bladder, or not 2 bladder? That is the question</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Davis, Monique G. ; Blankenship, James C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Monique G. ; Blankenship, James C.</creatorcontrib><description>Radial artery occlusion remains an unsolved problem with radial access even when patent hemostasis technique is used. Ulnar compression during radial artery patent hemostasis further decreases radial artery occlusion and is recognized as a radial access "best practice". In this study ulnar compression with a 2‐bladder band decreased radial occlusion rates compared to conventional patent hemostasis with a 1‐bladder band and may offer an elegant solution to the problem of how to achieve ulnar compression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30375</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Compression ; Hemostasis ; Occlusion</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2022-09, Vol.100 (3), p.392-394</ispartof><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c165t-e51a2a721bfbbcba0d70574beb608c8a462ffba58e371e22331b7e8cb922c7d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4966-533X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Monique G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankenship, James C.</creatorcontrib><title>2 bladder, or not 2 bladder? That is the question</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><description>Radial artery occlusion remains an unsolved problem with radial access even when patent hemostasis technique is used. Ulnar compression during radial artery patent hemostasis further decreases radial artery occlusion and is recognized as a radial access "best practice". In this study ulnar compression with a 2‐bladder band decreased radial occlusion rates compared to conventional patent hemostasis with a 1‐bladder band and may offer an elegant solution to the problem of how to achieve ulnar compression.</description><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Hemostasis</subject><subject>Occlusion</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKsH_0HAi4JbM5PNJnsSKX5BwUsFbyHJZumW7aYm24P_3u22ePA0w_DwzsxDyDWwGTCGD85VM864FCdkAgIxk1h8nR57KPPinFyktGaMlQWWEwJIbWuqysd7GiLtQk__Jo90uTI9bRLtV55-73zqm9BdkrPatMlfHeuUfL48L-dv2eLj9X3-tMgcFKLPvACDRiLY2lpnDaskEzK33hZMOWXyAuvaGqE8l-AROQcrvXK2RHSyUnxKbg-52xjG3XrTJOfb1nQ-7JJGCajyXCgc0Jt_6DrsYjdcN1LDr1zuA-8OlIshpehrvY3NxsQfDUzv5elBnh7l8V_lXl8A</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Davis, Monique G.</creator><creator>Blankenship, James C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-533X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>2 bladder, or not 2 bladder? That is the question</title><author>Davis, Monique G. ; Blankenship, James C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c165t-e51a2a721bfbbcba0d70574beb608c8a462ffba58e371e22331b7e8cb922c7d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Hemostasis</topic><topic>Occlusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Monique G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankenship, James C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Monique G.</au><au>Blankenship, James C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>2 bladder, or not 2 bladder? That is the question</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>392</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>392-394</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><abstract>Radial artery occlusion remains an unsolved problem with radial access even when patent hemostasis technique is used. Ulnar compression during radial artery patent hemostasis further decreases radial artery occlusion and is recognized as a radial access "best practice". In this study ulnar compression with a 2‐bladder band decreased radial occlusion rates compared to conventional patent hemostasis with a 1‐bladder band and may offer an elegant solution to the problem of how to achieve ulnar compression.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ccd.30375</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-533X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-1946
ispartof Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2022-09, Vol.100 (3), p.392-394
issn 1522-1946
1522-726X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2712844582
source Wiley Journals
subjects Compression
Hemostasis
Occlusion
title 2 bladder, or not 2 bladder? That is the question
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A17%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=2%20bladder,%20or%20not%202%20bladder?%20That%20is%20the%20question&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Davis,%20Monique%20G.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=392&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=392-394&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.30375&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2712009378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2712009378&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true