Extra-Anatomic Bypass and Excision is Superior to Graft Salvage Attempts with Antibiotic Beads to Treat Vascular Graft Infections in the Groin
This study aimed to determine if conventional extra-anatomic bypass and graft removal versus aggressive attempts at graft preservation have better survival and limb salvage in patients with localized groin wound infections of vascular grafts. We conducted a retrospective review of 53 consecutive pat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of vascular surgery 2023-01, Vol.88, p.118-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This study aimed to determine if conventional extra-anatomic bypass and graft removal versus aggressive attempts at graft preservation have better survival and limb salvage in patients with localized groin wound infections of vascular grafts.
We conducted a retrospective review of 53 consecutive patients with vascular graft infections presenting in the groin. Treatment groups consisted of group 1 (extra-anatomic bypass and graft excision, n = 22) and group 2 (initial graft preservation attempts with utilization of antibiotic beads, n = 31). In group 2, patients underwent serial debridement and placement of antibiotic beads until culture-negative wounds were achieved. Significantly more patients underwent muscle flap coverage in group 2 (27/31) compared with group 1 (7/22; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0890-5096 1615-5947 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.08.008 |