Extra-Anatomic Bypass and Excision is Superior to Graft Salvage Attempts with Antibiotic Beads to Treat Vascular Graft Infections in the Groin

This study aimed to determine if conventional extra-anatomic bypass and graft removal versus aggressive attempts at graft preservation have better survival and limb salvage in patients with localized groin wound infections of vascular grafts. We conducted a retrospective review of 53 consecutive pat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of vascular surgery 2023-01, Vol.88, p.118-126
Hauptverfasser: Perry, Thomas J., Fraser, Simon, Orion, Kristine, Haurani, Mounir, Tillman, Bryan, Vaccaro, Patrick, Go, Michael R., Sarac, Timur P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to determine if conventional extra-anatomic bypass and graft removal versus aggressive attempts at graft preservation have better survival and limb salvage in patients with localized groin wound infections of vascular grafts. We conducted a retrospective review of 53 consecutive patients with vascular graft infections presenting in the groin. Treatment groups consisted of group 1 (extra-anatomic bypass and graft excision, n = 22) and group 2 (initial graft preservation attempts with utilization of antibiotic beads, n = 31). In group 2, patients underwent serial debridement and placement of antibiotic beads until culture-negative wounds were achieved. Significantly more patients underwent muscle flap coverage in group 2 (27/31) compared with group 1 (7/22; P 
ISSN:0890-5096
1615-5947
DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2022.08.008