Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasonography to Guide PCI

In a randomized trial of fractional flow reserve versus IVUS to guide PCI, the use of FFR resulted in fewer coronary interventions and was noninferior to IVUS with respect to clinical outcomes at 2 years.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2022-09, Vol.387 (9), p.779-789
Hauptverfasser: Koo, Bon-Kwon, Hu, Xinyang, Kang, Jeehoon, Zhang, Jinlong, Jiang, Jun, Hahn, Joo-Yong, Nam, Chang-Wook, Doh, Joon-Hyung, Lee, Bong-Ki, Kim, Weon, Huang, Jinyu, Jiang, Fan, Zhou, Hao, Chen, Peng, Tang, Lijiang, Jiang, Wenbing, Chen, Xiaomin, He, Wenming, Ahn, Sung-Gyun, Yoon, Myeong-Ho, Kim, Ung, Lee, Joo-Myung, Hwang, Doyeon, Ki, You-Jeong, Shin, Eun-Seok, Kim, Hyo-Soo, Tahk, Seung-Jea, Wang, Jian’an
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In a randomized trial of fractional flow reserve versus IVUS to guide PCI, the use of FFR resulted in fewer coronary interventions and was noninferior to IVUS with respect to clinical outcomes at 2 years.
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2201546