Relationship between Diabetes Status and Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with risk of sarcopenia. However, whether glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are associated with sarcopenia has not reached a consensus. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between diabetes status based on HbA1c levels and sarcopenia indices...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2022-10, Vol.23 (10), p.1718.e7-1718.e12
Hauptverfasser: Nishimoto, Kazuhei, Doi, Takehiko, Tsutsumimoto, Kota, Nakakubo, Sho, Kurita, Satoshi, Kiuchi, Yuto, Shimada, Hiroyuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with risk of sarcopenia. However, whether glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are associated with sarcopenia has not reached a consensus. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between diabetes status based on HbA1c levels and sarcopenia indices in community-dwelling older adults stratified by body mass index (BMI) status. An observational cross-sectional study. General community setting. The participants were 18,940 community-dwelling older adults (mean age 73.7 ± 5.7 years, 45.0% men). According to their medical history for diabetes mellitus and blood HbA1c levels the participants were classified into the control group (no DM history and HbA1c ≤5.6%), pre-DM group (no DM history and HbA1c 5.7%–6.4%), or DM group (DM history or HbA1c ≥6.5%). For assessments of sarcopenia, muscle mass and muscle strength were measured based on the clinical definition. A multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the DM group did not have a clear association with sarcopenia [odds ratio (OR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82–1.38] or low muscle mass (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94–1.39), and was associated with low muscle strength (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08–1.36) in the adjusted model including BMI. There was a positive correlation between BMI and skeletal muscle index (r = 0.57, P < .001). Stratified by BMI, the DM group was associated with low muscle mass among the underweight participants (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.03–3.39), and low muscle strength among the overweight participants (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04–1.43). Diabetes status was associated with low muscle mass and low muscle strength, and the association depended on BMI. Our findings could be helpful for identifying older adults with a high risk of sarcopenia, although further study is needed.
ISSN:1525-8610
1538-9375
DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2022.07.020