Arthroscopic capsular release versus manipulation under anaesthesia for treating frozen shoulder — a prospective randomised study
Purpose Arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) and Manipulation under anaesthesia(MUA) have been widely used in the treatment of frozen shoulder (FS). However, there is only limited Level-I evidence to prefer ACR over MUA. The purpose of our study was to conduct a randomised trial comparing ACR versus...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International orthopaedics 2022-11, Vol.46 (11), p.2593-2601 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
Arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) and Manipulation under anaesthesia(MUA) have been widely used in the treatment of frozen shoulder (FS). However, there is only limited Level-I evidence to prefer ACR over MUA. The purpose of our study was to conduct a randomised trial comparing ACR versus MUA to assess the difference in outcome, complications and cost-effectiveness of both procedures.
Methods
From May 2020 to June 2021, patients presenting with FS were randomised into two groups ACR (
n
= 44) and MUA (
n
= 41). Patients with arthritis, full-thickness cuff tears, history of trauma/previous surgery around the shoulder were excluded from the study. Range of movement (ROM), pain grading using visual analogue scale (VAS), functional scores- UCLA, CONSTANT and EuroQol-5D scores were measured pre-operatively and post-operatively. MRI was done at three weeks post-operatively for screening complications of either procedure. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was used for cost-analysis.
Results
Post-operatively, patients had significant improvement in pain, ROM and functional scores in both groups (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0341-2695 1432-5195 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00264-022-05558-z |