Cerebrovascular reactivity during visual stimulation: Does hypnotizability matter?

[Display omitted] •Visual stimulation was administered to med-high and med-low hypnotizable Ss.•Blood flow velocity and vascular reactivity (CVR) did not differ between them.•Hypnotizability and CVR negatively correlated only among med-highs.•Higher hypnotizability is associated with lower cerebral metabolic demand. Hypnotizability is a trait associated with several physiological correlates including cardiovascular control. The present study aimed to investigate the posterior cerebral artery flow velocity (PCAv) in basal closed eyes (B) and during visual stimulation (VS) conditions in med-highs and med-lows. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were submitted to the hypnotic assessment through the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, form A which classified 13 low-to-medium (med-lows) and 10 high-to-medium (med-highs) hypnotizable participants. One subject scoring 6 out of 12 was excluded from the comparisons between groups. Arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 were monitored during both B and VS conditions. Simultaneously, PCAv was assessed by transcranial Doppler. Cerebrovascular Reactivity (CVR) was computed as a percentage of the PCAv change occurring during VS with respect to B (ΔPCAv). During VS both groups increased their PCAv (mean ± SD: 7.9 ± 5.2 %) significantly with no significant group difference. However, among med-highs, CVR was negatively correlated with hypnotizability scores. Thus, higher hypnotizability may be associated with lower metabolic demand in response to VS only within med-highs hypnotizable participants.