Korean LupusPRO: Cross-Cultural validation study for systemic lupus erythematosus

Objective To establish the reliability and validity of the Korean version of LupusPRO version 1.7 (v1.7) for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Methods LupusPRO v1.7 was translated into Korean, followed by pretesting among five native Korean speakers. We administered the LupusPRO v1.7 surv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lupus 2022-10, Vol.31 (12), p.1498-1507
Hauptverfasser: Han, Jung-Yong, Cho, Soo-Kyung, Nam, Eunwoo, Kim, Hyoungyoung, Lee, Shin-Seok, Jolly, Meenakshi, Sung, Yoon-Kyoung
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To establish the reliability and validity of the Korean version of LupusPRO version 1.7 (v1.7) for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Methods LupusPRO v1.7 was translated into Korean, followed by pretesting among five native Korean speakers. We administered the LupusPRO v1.7 survey to five SLE patients and made minor changes to clarify the language. Then, 133 SLE patients participated in the validation procedure. In each domain, the internal consistency reliability (ICR) and test-retest reliability (TRR) were assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Criterion validity was evaluated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient with the other measures such as SF-36, EQ-5D VAS, and SELENA-SLEDAI PGA. Construct validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using the unweighted least square estimation method. Results The mean age of the 133 patients was 36.14 years, and 97% of them were women. Analysis of 130 returned questionnaires revealed that most ICRs of the Korean LupusPRO v1.7 domains were acceptable, with Cronbach’s alphas in the range of 0.579–0.949, and most TRRs were good with ICCs from 0.582 to 0.851. Criterion validities presented significant correlations between the LupusPRO v1.7 and other measures validated. In the analysis of the CFA model, the goodness of fit indices demonstrated an acceptable fit. Factor loadings for most individual items were between 0.548 and 0.985. The average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) of most domains were greater than 0.5 and 0.7, respectively, demonstrating acceptable convergent and discriminant validities. Conclusions The Korean version of LupusPRO v.17 had acceptable reliability and validity.
ISSN:0961-2033
1477-0962
DOI:10.1177/09612033221122984