Comparison of structure development in injection molding of isotactic and syndiotactic polypropylenes
A comparative study of the crystallization and orientation development in injection molding isotactic and syndiotactic polypropylenes was made. The injection molded samples were characterized using wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD) techniques and birefringence. The injection molded isotactic polyp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Polymer engineering and science 2002-08, Vol.42 (8), p.1642-1656 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A comparative study of the crystallization and orientation development in injection molding isotactic and syndiotactic polypropylenes was made. The injection molded samples were characterized using wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD) techniques and birefringence. The injection molded isotactic polypropylene samples formed well‐defined sublayers (skin, shear and core zones) and exhibited polymorphic crystal structures of the monoclinic α‐form and the hexagonal β‐form. Considerable amounts of β‐form crystal were formed in the shear and core zones, depending on the injection pressure or on the packing pressure. The isotactic polypropylene samples had relatively high frozen‐in orientations in the skin layer and the shear zone. The injection molded syndiotactic polypropylene exhibited the disordered Form I structure, but it did not appear to crystallize during the mold‐filling stage because of its slow crystallization rate and to develop a distinct shear zone. The core zone orientation was greatly increased by application of high packing pressure. The isotactic polypropylene samples exhibited much higher birefringence than the syndiotactic polypropylene samples at the skin and shear layers, whereas both materials exhibited similar levels of crystalline orientation in these layers. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0032-3888 1548-2634 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pen.11059 |