Response Time Distributions and the Accumulation of Visual Evidence in Freely Moving Mice

•Mice rely on their vision to chase prey, avoid predators, find refuge, and choose mates.•We acquired thousands of responses from adult mice using an automated visual discrimination task.•Choices and response times (RT) can be described with an information-accumulation model.•Changes in the experime...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroscience 2022-10, Vol.501, p.25-41
Hauptverfasser: Treviño, Mario, Medina-Coss y León, Ricardo, Lezama, Elí
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Mice rely on their vision to chase prey, avoid predators, find refuge, and choose mates.•We acquired thousands of responses from adult mice using an automated visual discrimination task.•Choices and response times (RT) can be described with an information-accumulation model.•Changes in the experimental conditions were mirrored by changes in model parameters.•Our approach is useful to study attention, discrimination, and learning in adult mice. Response time (RT) distributions are histograms of the observed RTs for discriminative choices, comprising a rich source of empirical information to study perceptual processes. The drift–diffusion model (DDM), a mathematical formulation predicting decision tasks, reproduces the RT distributions, contributing to our understanding of these processes from a theoretical perspective. Notably, although the mouse is a popular model system for studying brain function and behavior, little is known about mouse perceptual RT distributions, and their description from an information-accumulation perspective. We combined an automated visual discrimination task with pharmacological micro-infusions of targeted brain regions to acquire thousands of responses from freely-moving adult mice. Both choices and escape latencies showed a strong dependency on stimulus discriminability. By applying a DDM fit to our experimental data, we found that the rate of incoming evidence (drift rate) increased with stimulus contrast but was reversibly impaired when inactivating the primary visual cortex (V1). Other brain regions involved in the decision-making process, the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and the frontal orienting fields (FOF), also influenced relevant parameters from the DDM. The large number of empirical observations that we collected for this study allowed us to achieve accurate convergence for the model fit. Therefore, changes in the experimental conditions were mirrored by changes in model parameters, suggesting the participation of relevant brain areas in the decision-making process. This approach could help interpret future studies involving attention, discrimination, and learning in adult mice.
ISSN:0306-4522
1873-7544
DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2022.08.015