Research on the proximity functions of microdosimetry of low energy electrons in liquid water based on different Monte Carlo codes

•Impact of the initial energy on the proximity function.•Impact of the cut-off energy on the proximity function.•Impact of the Monte Carlo codes on the proximity function.•Differences between TS and TS codes, TS and CH codes with the same cut-off energy. The proximity function is an important index...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physica medica 2022-09, Vol.101, p.120-128
Hauptverfasser: Du, ChuanSheng, Wang, YiDi, Xue, HuiYuan, Gao, Han, Liu, Kun, Kong, XiangHui, Zhang, WenYue, Yin, YuChen, Qiu, Dong, Wang, YouYou, Sun, Liang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Impact of the initial energy on the proximity function.•Impact of the cut-off energy on the proximity function.•Impact of the Monte Carlo codes on the proximity function.•Differences between TS and TS codes, TS and CH codes with the same cut-off energy. The proximity function is an important index in microdosimetry for describing the spatial distribution of energy, which is closely related to the biological effects of organs or tissues in the target area. In this work, the impact of parameters, such as physic models, cut-off energy, and initial energy, on the proximity function are quantitated and compared. According to the track structure (TS) and condensed history (CH) low-energy electromagnetic models, this paper chooses a variety of Monte Carlo (Monte Carlo, MC) codes (Geant4-DNA, PHITS, and Penelope) to simulate the track structure of low-energy electrons in liquid water and evaluates the influence of the electron initial energy, cut-off energy, energy spectrum, and physical model factors on the differential proximity function. The results show that the initial energy of electrons in the low-energy part (especially less than 1 keV) has a greater impact on the differential proximity function, and the choice of cut-off energy has a greater impact on the differential proximity function corresponding to small radius sites (generally less than 10 nm). The difference in the electronic energy spectrum has little effect on the result, and the proximity functions of different physics models show better consistency under large radius sites. This work comprehensively compares the differential proximity functions under different codes by setting a variety of simulation conditions and has basic guiding significance for helping users simulate and analyze the deposition characteristics of microscale electrons according to the selection of an appropriate methodology and cut-off energy.
ISSN:1120-1797
1724-191X
DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.08.006