Animal Models of Rotator Cuff Injury and Repair: A Systematic Review
There are a large number of animal studies on rotator cuff injury and repair, but a lack of detailed research and evaluation on the animal models. This systematic review aims to provide a framework for animal studies and repair patches for rotator cuff injury. Four hundred nine animal studies were i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews Reviews, 2022-12, Vol.28 (6), p.1258-1273 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | There are a large number of animal studies on rotator cuff injury and repair, but a lack of detailed research and evaluation on the animal models. This systematic review aims to provide a framework for animal studies and repair patches for rotator cuff injury. Four hundred nine animal studies were included, of which the most common animal model of rotator cuff injury is rat (53.56%), the most common site of rotator cuff injury is the supraspinatus tendon (62.10%), and the most common injury type (degree) is acute tear (full thickness) (48.41%). The most common research purpose is to evaluate the repair effect of the patch (24.94%), followed by the observation of pathophysiological changes after rotator cuff injury (20.87%). Among the five types of repair patch materials including nondegradable and degradable synthetic materials, autologous and allogeneic tissues, and naturally derived biomaterial, the last one is the mostly used (52.74%). For different animal models, the rodent models (rat and mouse) are the most commonly used and probably the most suitable species for preliminary studies of rotator cuff injury; the rabbit, canine, sheep, and goat models are more suitable for biomechanical performance testing, rehabilitation training, and validation of surgical methods; and the nonhuman primate models (monkey and baboon) are the closest to human, but it is more difficult to carry out the animal studies on them because of ethical issues, high feeding cost, and management difficulties. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1937-3368 1937-3376 |
DOI: | 10.1089/ten.teb.2022.0034 |