Thermal, acoustic, and nuclear magnetic resonance studies of cesium borate glasses

The purpose of this study was to compare the physical properties and structure of cesium borate glasses. Cesium borate glasses can be denoted as RCs 2O·B 2O 3, where R is the molar ratio of cesium oxide to boron oxide. We report a detailed study of the glass transition temperature ( T g) of these ce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of non-crystalline solids 2001-11, Vol.293, p.483-489
Hauptverfasser: Berryman, Jessica R., Feller, Steven A., Affatigato, Mario, Kodama, Masao, Meyer, Ben M., Martin, Steve W., Borsa, Ferdinando, Kroeker, Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this study was to compare the physical properties and structure of cesium borate glasses. Cesium borate glasses can be denoted as RCs 2O·B 2O 3, where R is the molar ratio of cesium oxide to boron oxide. We report a detailed study of the glass transition temperature ( T g) of these cesium borate glasses with 0.0⩽ R⩽0.55. Initially, the T g increased monotonically as R rose. It then leveled out at R=0.35 and fell at R=0.425. The T g data obtained using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) are in good agreement with Kodama et al.'s T g results from a differential thermal analyzer (DTA) as well as Chryssikos' model of the number of bridging oxygens per boron ( Z). We determined the fraction of boron atoms in tetrahedral co-ordination, N 4, for the same cesium borate glass samples using 11B NMR. The N 4 fractions followed a curve similar to that of the T g results until R=0.45, where it continued to rise as the T g fell. Also, the N 4 data have a similar trend but are consistently higher than those calculated from a model which employed Kodama and Kojima's ultrasonic velocity data. Finally, the NMR data do not display a significant lowering of the N 4 fraction in cesium borate when compared to lithium borate glasses.
ISSN:0022-3093
1873-4812
DOI:10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00754-2