Reduction of carotid baroreceptor sensitivity in systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVESSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease characterised by diffuse vasculopathy and fibrosis of skin and visceral organs. Moreover, autonomic dysfunction is also suggested as an important step during the multifactorial SSc pathogenesis. Baroreceptors are responsible for maintaining...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental rheumatology 2022-10, Vol.40 (10), p.1964-1969
Hauptverfasser: Colaci, Michele, Zanoli, Luca, La Malfa, Lara, Caruso, Rossella, De Andres, Maria Ilenia, Sambataro, Domenico, Sambataro, Gianluca, Castellino, Pietro, Malatino, Lorenzo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVESSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease characterised by diffuse vasculopathy and fibrosis of skin and visceral organs. Moreover, autonomic dysfunction is also suggested as an important step during the multifactorial SSc pathogenesis. Baroreceptors are responsible for maintaining blood pressure by means of autonomic system modulation. Considering that autonomic dysfunction and arteriosclerosis can both reduce baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS), in this cross-sectional study we investigated BRS in SSc patients. METHODSTwenty-one SSc patients (mean age 55±10 years, 18 females) and 147 age/sex-matched healthy controls were recruited for the study. BRS (ms/mmHg) was measured by a Finapres® Midi device (Finapres Medical Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Other parameters were measured: blood pressure, heart rate, heart rate variability triangular index (HRVI), intima-media thickness (IMT), carotid distensibility and pulse wave velocity (PWV). RESULTSBRS was significantly lower in SSc patients compared to controls (6.3±3.3 vs. 10.7±6.8 ms/mmHg; p=0.004). IMT was comparable between SSc and controls, whereas carotid distensibility was lower in SSc (20.1±7.6 vs. 26.6±13.3 KPa-1·10-3; p=0.02) and PWV higher in SSc (8.4±1.3 vs. 7.1±1.1 m/sec; p=0.01). Furthermore, HRVI was lower in SSc (4.5±2.1 vs. 7.5±2.8; p
ISSN:1593-098X
0392-856X
1593-098X
DOI:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/4j6028