Pathologic Outcomes in Single Versus Multiple Areas of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has led to increased detection of architectural distortion (AD). Management of patients with multiple areas of AD is not established. The purpose of this article is to compare pathologic outcomes between single and multiple areas of AD identified on DBT. This retro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2023-01, Vol.220 (1), p.50-62 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has led to increased detection of architectural distortion (AD). Management of patients with multiple areas of AD is not established.
The purpose of this article is to compare pathologic outcomes between single and multiple areas of AD identified on DBT.
This retrospective study included 402 patients (mean age, 56 years) who underwent image-guided core needle biopsy of AD visualized on DBT between April 7, 2017, and April 16, 2019. Patients were classified as having a single or multiple areas of AD according to the presence of distinct areas of AD described in the clinical radiology reports. The pathologic diagnosis for each AD was on the basis of the most aggressive pathology identified on either biopsy or surgical excision, if performed. Patients with single and multiple areas of AD were compared.
The sample included 372 patients with a single AD (145 benign, 121 high risk, 105 malignant, one other) and 30 patients with multiple visualized ADs, including 66 biopsied ADs (10 benign, 35 high risk, 21 malignant). At pathologic assessment on a per-lesion basis, multiple compared with single ADs showed higher frequency of high-risk pathology (53.0% vs 32.5%,
= .002) but no difference in frequency of malignancy (31.8% vs 28.2%,
= .56). In multivariable analysis of a range of patient-related characteristics, the presence of single versus multiple areas of AD was not independently associated with malignancy (
= .51). In patients with multiple areas of AD, the most aggressive pathology (benign, high risk, or malignant) across all ADs was not associated with the number of ADs (
= .73). In 8 of 24 patients with at least two ipsilateral biopsied ADs, the ipsilateral areas varied in terms of most aggressive pathology; in 5 of 10 patients with contralateral biopsied ADs, the contralateral areas varied in most aggressive pathology.
The presence of multiple areas of AD, compared with a single AD, was significantly more likely to yield high-risk pathology but was not significantly different in yield of malignancy. In patients with multiple ADs, multiple ipsilateral or contralateral ADs commonly varied in pathologic classification (benign, high risk, or malignant).
These findings may help guide management of AD visualized by DBT, including multiple ADs. For patients with multiple areas of AD, biopsy of all areas may be warranted given variation in pathologic diagnoses. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0361-803X 1546-3141 1546-3141 |
DOI: | 10.2214/AJR.22.27625 |