Is non-occupational HIV Post Exposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) still used? An exploration of nPEP use since widespread availability of HIV PrEP

Background Non-occupational Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) is an effective HIV prevention strategy in gay and bisexual men (GBM) taken after possible exposure. HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is also a highly effective HIV prevention strategy. Methods A retrospective audit of medical records o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of STD & AIDS 2022-09, Vol.33 (10), p.914-919
Hauptverfasser: Woodward, Shannon C, Baynes, Anne M, Tyson, Hayley A, Dunlop, William A, Martin, Sarah J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Non-occupational Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) is an effective HIV prevention strategy in gay and bisexual men (GBM) taken after possible exposure. HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is also a highly effective HIV prevention strategy. Methods A retrospective audit of medical records of GBM presenting to a sexual health centre and provided with nPEP compared two periods to determine if nPEP usage changed following availability of PrEP. In the first period (P1) PrEP was available through extended trials. In the second period (P2) PrEP became more accessible through the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). Period comparisons were performed using a two-population test of proportions with one-tailed testing and significance set at P < .05 using SPSS Statistics Version 25. Results There were 232 GBM provided with nPEP in P1, and 202 in P2. A two-population test of proportions demonstrated that GBM presentations for nPEP decreased significantly from 302/4779 (6.3%) of GBM visits in P1 to 221/7205 (3.1%) in P2 when PrEP was more accessible (Z=8.53, P < .001). PrEP uptake after presenting for nPEP increased from 30 (12.9%) of total GBM visits in P1 to 69 (34.2%) in P2 (Z=5.26, p < .001). Conclusions GBM accessing nPEP decreased with statistical significance post introduction of PBS PrEP.
ISSN:0956-4624
1758-1052
DOI:10.1177/09564624221116527