Mild-moderate equine asthma: A scoping review of evidence supporting the consensus definition

Current consensus defines mild-moderate equine asthma (mEA; previously inflammatory airway disease) by a hierarchy of indicators of lung pathology: cough, poor performance, increased tracheobronchial mucus, inflammatory bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cytology and pulmonary dysfunction. Exclusion criteria include fever, systemic disease, or increased resting respiratory effort. The aim of this review was to inform future research by identifying gaps, strengths and weaknesses in the current body of evidence supporting this consensus-proposed definition. Objectives were to critique evidence supporting the inclusion of each diagnostic indicator in the case definition, by summarising and evaluating evidence for its association with higher-level indicators of lung inflammation. Searches of three databases identified 2275 articles relating to mEA or its diagnostic indicators, from which 298 full-text articles were screened and 45 reviewed in full. Studies (n = 44) had been performed worldwide in clinics, hospitals, racetracks, yards or research herds, in 6092 horses. Studies were predominantly opportunistic observational (n = 13/44: 29.5%) or cross-sectional (n = 11/44; 25%). The median number of horses per study was 74. Where breed and use were reported most were Thoroughbreds (58.2%; 2730/4688) and racehorses (72.8%; n = 3960/5439). Domains rated as high risk of bias in almost 50% of articles were ‘study power’ and ‘masking’. Heterogeneity in clinical and laboratory measures precluded meta-analysis. Evidence was more consistent for certain pairwise relationships (e.g., between cough and tracheobronchial mucus) than others (e.g., BAL cytology and lung function). Findings highlight the need for increased standardisation of diagnostic methods and reporting to facilitate future systematic review and meta-analysis. •45 Articles examined associations between indicators of mild-moderate equine asthma.•High risk of bias most commonly related to low study power and lack of masking.•There was consistent evidence for an association between cough and tracheal mucus.•The functional relevance of airway mucus and cytology remains unclear.•Standardised diagnostic methods and larger study populations would be valuable.