Dynamics of DNA damage response markers, RAD51 and XRCC1, throughout the menstrual cycle and pregnancy in healthy women. Increment during pregnancy and relation to a low titer of antinuclear antibodies

Problem Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) potentially play a role in the pathogenesis of connective tissue diseases (CTDs); however, they are also detected in healthy individuals. Our understanding of the physiological and pathological origin of ANA is incomplete. Both; female reproductive processes and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of reproductive immunology (1989) 2022-10, Vol.88 (4), p.e13597-n/a
Hauptverfasser: González‐Chávez, Susana Aideé, Burrola‐De Anda, Jessica Ivonne, Mireles‐Canales, Paola, Soto‐Adame, Miguel Angel, Pacheco‐Tena, César
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Problem Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) potentially play a role in the pathogenesis of connective tissue diseases (CTDs); however, they are also detected in healthy individuals. Our understanding of the physiological and pathological origin of ANA is incomplete. Both; female reproductive processes and deficiencies in DNA damage response (DDR) have been independently associated with ANA production. However, the link between these two factors and the presence of ANA is unclear Method of study A cohort study was conducted on 87 non‐pregnant and 51 healthy pregnant women. ANA and the DDR markers X‐ray repair cross‐complementing 1 (XRCC1) and recombinase (RAD51) were quantified in sera by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Additionally, ANA was detected by indirect immunofluorescence in HEp‐2 cells in 1:40 diluted sera during the three phases of the menstrual cycle in non‐pregnant women and every trimester in pregnant women Results The prevalence of ANA+ in healthy women was 26.1%, with no significant differences between pregnant and non‐pregnant women. ANA and DDR marker levels did not vary among the three phases of the menstrual cycle or the three trimesters of pregnancy. However, DDR marker levels were higher in pregnant women than in non‐pregnant women (p 
ISSN:1046-7408
1600-0897
DOI:10.1111/aji.13597