Subintimal Crossing of Chronic Total Occlusions in Peripheral Arteries With a Dual Guidewire Balloon Catheter: The PRAESTO Study

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antegrade fenestration re-entry (AFR) using a dual guidewire angioplasty balloon for chronic total occlusion (CTO) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Material and methods: This is a retrospective score match...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endovascular therapy 2024-02, Vol.31 (1), p.45-54
Hauptverfasser: Del Giudice, Costantino, Gandini, Roberto
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antegrade fenestration re-entry (AFR) using a dual guidewire angioplasty balloon for chronic total occlusion (CTO) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Material and methods: This is a retrospective score matching analysis study comparing a study cohort composed of PAD patients with CTO treated with AFR subintimal recanalization using a dual guidewire angioplasty balloon and a matched control group, selected on baseline cardiovascular risk factor and lesions characteristics, treated with a conventional subintimal recanalization. Procedure outcomes include procedural success, successful subintimal re-entry, need for distal puncture, procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and dose area product. Clinical variables, including primary patency, freedom from amputation, freedom from re-interventions, and freedom from death, were used to compare the study groups. Results: Thirty patients in the study group were compared with 60 patients in the matched control group (mean age, male). A significant higher subintimal re-entry success (100% vs 76.7% in control group, p=0.004) and lower need of distal tibial punction (0 vs 14 [23.3%] patients in control group, p=0.004) were observed in the study group. A surgical conversion to bypass was needed in 5 patients in the control group. Shorter procedural and fluoroscopy time were observed in the study group (41.1±10.8 minutes vs 146.6±62. and 16.7±3.5 minutes vs 34.3±14.2 minutes in control group respectively, p
ISSN:1526-6028
1545-1550
DOI:10.1177/15266028221106308