Digital rectal examination impact on PSA derivatives and prostate biopsy triggers: a contemporary study

Objective To evaluate the impact of the digital rectal exam (DRE) on PSA measurements and clinical decision-making. Methods Healthy male volunteers between 50 and 70 years old were recruited during a 30-day public screening program. PSA levels were measured using two different methods (standard enha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International urology and nephrology 2022-09, Vol.54 (9), p.2117-2123
Hauptverfasser: da Silva Junior, Maurício Moreira, Capibaribe, Diego Moreira, Avilez, Natalia Dalsenter, Jalalizadeh, Mehrsa, Dias, Luiza Bortoloti, Laranja, Walker W., Guimarães, Fabio, Simões, Fabiano A., Alonso, João C. C., Rejowski, Ronald F., Cintra, Adriano, Reis, Leonardo O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2123
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2117
container_title International urology and nephrology
container_volume 54
creator da Silva Junior, Maurício Moreira
Capibaribe, Diego Moreira
Avilez, Natalia Dalsenter
Jalalizadeh, Mehrsa
Dias, Luiza Bortoloti
Laranja, Walker W.
Guimarães, Fabio
Simões, Fabiano A.
Alonso, João C. C.
Rejowski, Ronald F.
Cintra, Adriano
Reis, Leonardo O.
description Objective To evaluate the impact of the digital rectal exam (DRE) on PSA measurements and clinical decision-making. Methods Healthy male volunteers between 50 and 70 years old were recruited during a 30-day public screening program. PSA levels were measured using two different methods (standard enhanced chemiluminescence immunoassay—ECLIA, and novel immunochromatography assay—ICA/rapid PSA) in the same blood sample. Two blood samples were drawn; first before DRE and the second 30–40 min after DRE. The effect of DRE on PSA levels and its impact on clinical decision-making for individual patients were evaluated based on different biopsy trigger cutoffs. Results ECLIA-PSA was measured in 74 participants both pre- and 37 ± 5 min post-DRE, mean age 57.2 ± 8.3 years, and mean prostate volume 33.6 (20–80) cm 3 . Both total and free ECLIA-PSA increased significantly after DRE (mean increase of 0.47 and 0.26 ng/ml, respectively, both p   3 ng/ml, 13 increase > 0.75 ng/ml, 3 PSA density > 0.15, and 1 free/total PSA  0.18. ICA-PSA was detectable (> 2.0 ng/ml) in 5 of 45 measured samples (11%) before DRE and 13/45 (29%) after DRE, p  = 0.0316. Four among five detectable ICA-PSA tests increased after DRE. Conclusion Performing DRE immediately before PSA measurement might change the clinical decision-making on a significant number of occasions (roughly 1 in 3); even though the mean increase (0.47 ng/ml) looks deceivingly small. Further studies are required that include gold standard tests (biopsy, or imaging).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11255-022-03283-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2685030106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2685030106</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-2b9233e693c02808cde37890643dd22ba4f04cf168a533e8745c5208c9a02553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH78AU8BL16qk6RpU2_L-gkLCu49ZNO0ZOmXSbq4_96sFRQPnmZgnhneeRC6IHBNAPIbTwjlPAFKE2BUsIQfoBnhOUsoF-nhr_4YnXi_AYBCAMxQfWdrG1SDndH7Yj5UazsVbN9h2w5KBxy717c5Lo2z2zjYGo9VV-LB9T6oYPDa9oPf4eBsXRvnb7HCuu-CaYfeKbfDPozl7gwdVarx5vy7nqLVw_1q8ZQsXx6fF_NlohmwkNB1QRkzWcE0UAFCl4blooAsZWVJ6VqlFaS6IplQPHIiT7nmNHKFgiiAnaKr6WxM9z4aH2RrvTZNozrTj17STHBgQCCL6OUfdNOProvhJM2jHhAiE5GiE6Xju96ZSg7OtvEtSUDu1ctJvYzq5Zd6uU_BpiUf4S5K-Tn9z9Yn2ZOGRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2700908868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Digital rectal examination impact on PSA derivatives and prostate biopsy triggers: a contemporary study</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>da Silva Junior, Maurício Moreira ; Capibaribe, Diego Moreira ; Avilez, Natalia Dalsenter ; Jalalizadeh, Mehrsa ; Dias, Luiza Bortoloti ; Laranja, Walker W. ; Guimarães, Fabio ; Simões, Fabiano A. ; Alonso, João C. C. ; Rejowski, Ronald F. ; Cintra, Adriano ; Reis, Leonardo O.</creator><creatorcontrib>da Silva Junior, Maurício Moreira ; Capibaribe, Diego Moreira ; Avilez, Natalia Dalsenter ; Jalalizadeh, Mehrsa ; Dias, Luiza Bortoloti ; Laranja, Walker W. ; Guimarães, Fabio ; Simões, Fabiano A. ; Alonso, João C. C. ; Rejowski, Ronald F. ; Cintra, Adriano ; Reis, Leonardo O.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the impact of the digital rectal exam (DRE) on PSA measurements and clinical decision-making. Methods Healthy male volunteers between 50 and 70 years old were recruited during a 30-day public screening program. PSA levels were measured using two different methods (standard enhanced chemiluminescence immunoassay—ECLIA, and novel immunochromatography assay—ICA/rapid PSA) in the same blood sample. Two blood samples were drawn; first before DRE and the second 30–40 min after DRE. The effect of DRE on PSA levels and its impact on clinical decision-making for individual patients were evaluated based on different biopsy trigger cutoffs. Results ECLIA-PSA was measured in 74 participants both pre- and 37 ± 5 min post-DRE, mean age 57.2 ± 8.3 years, and mean prostate volume 33.6 (20–80) cm 3 . Both total and free ECLIA-PSA increased significantly after DRE (mean increase of 0.47 and 0.26 ng/ml, respectively, both p  &lt; 0.001). Different internationally accepted biopsy triggers were reached after DRE only: 5 total PSA &gt; 3 ng/ml, 13 increase &gt; 0.75 ng/ml, 3 PSA density &gt; 0.15, and 1 free/total PSA &lt; 0.18. On two occasions, patients were pushed away from biopsy trigger after DRE due to free/total PSA &gt; 0.18. ICA-PSA was detectable (&gt; 2.0 ng/ml) in 5 of 45 measured samples (11%) before DRE and 13/45 (29%) after DRE, p  = 0.0316. Four among five detectable ICA-PSA tests increased after DRE. Conclusion Performing DRE immediately before PSA measurement might change the clinical decision-making on a significant number of occasions (roughly 1 in 3); even though the mean increase (0.47 ng/ml) looks deceivingly small. Further studies are required that include gold standard tests (biopsy, or imaging).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-2584</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0301-1623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03283-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Chemiluminescence ; Clinical decision making ; Decision making ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Nephrology ; Patients ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Rectum ; Urology ; Urology - Original Paper</subject><ispartof>International urology and nephrology, 2022-09, Vol.54 (9), p.2117-2123</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-2b9233e693c02808cde37890643dd22ba4f04cf168a533e8745c5208c9a02553</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2092-414X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11255-022-03283-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11255-022-03283-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>da Silva Junior, Maurício Moreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capibaribe, Diego Moreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avilez, Natalia Dalsenter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalalizadeh, Mehrsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Luiza Bortoloti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laranja, Walker W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simões, Fabiano A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, João C. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rejowski, Ronald F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cintra, Adriano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Leonardo O.</creatorcontrib><title>Digital rectal examination impact on PSA derivatives and prostate biopsy triggers: a contemporary study</title><title>International urology and nephrology</title><addtitle>Int Urol Nephrol</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the impact of the digital rectal exam (DRE) on PSA measurements and clinical decision-making. Methods Healthy male volunteers between 50 and 70 years old were recruited during a 30-day public screening program. PSA levels were measured using two different methods (standard enhanced chemiluminescence immunoassay—ECLIA, and novel immunochromatography assay—ICA/rapid PSA) in the same blood sample. Two blood samples were drawn; first before DRE and the second 30–40 min after DRE. The effect of DRE on PSA levels and its impact on clinical decision-making for individual patients were evaluated based on different biopsy trigger cutoffs. Results ECLIA-PSA was measured in 74 participants both pre- and 37 ± 5 min post-DRE, mean age 57.2 ± 8.3 years, and mean prostate volume 33.6 (20–80) cm 3 . Both total and free ECLIA-PSA increased significantly after DRE (mean increase of 0.47 and 0.26 ng/ml, respectively, both p  &lt; 0.001). Different internationally accepted biopsy triggers were reached after DRE only: 5 total PSA &gt; 3 ng/ml, 13 increase &gt; 0.75 ng/ml, 3 PSA density &gt; 0.15, and 1 free/total PSA &lt; 0.18. On two occasions, patients were pushed away from biopsy trigger after DRE due to free/total PSA &gt; 0.18. ICA-PSA was detectable (&gt; 2.0 ng/ml) in 5 of 45 measured samples (11%) before DRE and 13/45 (29%) after DRE, p  = 0.0316. Four among five detectable ICA-PSA tests increased after DRE. Conclusion Performing DRE immediately before PSA measurement might change the clinical decision-making on a significant number of occasions (roughly 1 in 3); even though the mean increase (0.47 ng/ml) looks deceivingly small. Further studies are required that include gold standard tests (biopsy, or imaging).</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Chemiluminescence</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Urology - Original Paper</subject><issn>1573-2584</issn><issn>0301-1623</issn><issn>1573-2584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouH78AU8BL16qk6RpU2_L-gkLCu49ZNO0ZOmXSbq4_96sFRQPnmZgnhneeRC6IHBNAPIbTwjlPAFKE2BUsIQfoBnhOUsoF-nhr_4YnXi_AYBCAMxQfWdrG1SDndH7Yj5UazsVbN9h2w5KBxy717c5Lo2z2zjYGo9VV-LB9T6oYPDa9oPf4eBsXRvnb7HCuu-CaYfeKbfDPozl7gwdVarx5vy7nqLVw_1q8ZQsXx6fF_NlohmwkNB1QRkzWcE0UAFCl4blooAsZWVJ6VqlFaS6IplQPHIiT7nmNHKFgiiAnaKr6WxM9z4aH2RrvTZNozrTj17STHBgQCCL6OUfdNOProvhJM2jHhAiE5GiE6Xju96ZSg7OtvEtSUDu1ctJvYzq5Zd6uU_BpiUf4S5K-Tn9z9Yn2ZOGRQ</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>da Silva Junior, Maurício Moreira</creator><creator>Capibaribe, Diego Moreira</creator><creator>Avilez, Natalia Dalsenter</creator><creator>Jalalizadeh, Mehrsa</creator><creator>Dias, Luiza Bortoloti</creator><creator>Laranja, Walker W.</creator><creator>Guimarães, Fabio</creator><creator>Simões, Fabiano A.</creator><creator>Alonso, João C. C.</creator><creator>Rejowski, Ronald F.</creator><creator>Cintra, Adriano</creator><creator>Reis, Leonardo O.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2092-414X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Digital rectal examination impact on PSA derivatives and prostate biopsy triggers: a contemporary study</title><author>da Silva Junior, Maurício Moreira ; Capibaribe, Diego Moreira ; Avilez, Natalia Dalsenter ; Jalalizadeh, Mehrsa ; Dias, Luiza Bortoloti ; Laranja, Walker W. ; Guimarães, Fabio ; Simões, Fabiano A. ; Alonso, João C. C. ; Rejowski, Ronald F. ; Cintra, Adriano ; Reis, Leonardo O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-2b9233e693c02808cde37890643dd22ba4f04cf168a533e8745c5208c9a02553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Chemiluminescence</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Urology - Original Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>da Silva Junior, Maurício Moreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capibaribe, Diego Moreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avilez, Natalia Dalsenter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jalalizadeh, Mehrsa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Luiza Bortoloti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laranja, Walker W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimarães, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simões, Fabiano A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, João C. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rejowski, Ronald F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cintra, Adriano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Leonardo O.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International urology and nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>da Silva Junior, Maurício Moreira</au><au>Capibaribe, Diego Moreira</au><au>Avilez, Natalia Dalsenter</au><au>Jalalizadeh, Mehrsa</au><au>Dias, Luiza Bortoloti</au><au>Laranja, Walker W.</au><au>Guimarães, Fabio</au><au>Simões, Fabiano A.</au><au>Alonso, João C. C.</au><au>Rejowski, Ronald F.</au><au>Cintra, Adriano</au><au>Reis, Leonardo O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Digital rectal examination impact on PSA derivatives and prostate biopsy triggers: a contemporary study</atitle><jtitle>International urology and nephrology</jtitle><stitle>Int Urol Nephrol</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2117</spage><epage>2123</epage><pages>2117-2123</pages><issn>1573-2584</issn><issn>0301-1623</issn><eissn>1573-2584</eissn><abstract>Objective To evaluate the impact of the digital rectal exam (DRE) on PSA measurements and clinical decision-making. Methods Healthy male volunteers between 50 and 70 years old were recruited during a 30-day public screening program. PSA levels were measured using two different methods (standard enhanced chemiluminescence immunoassay—ECLIA, and novel immunochromatography assay—ICA/rapid PSA) in the same blood sample. Two blood samples were drawn; first before DRE and the second 30–40 min after DRE. The effect of DRE on PSA levels and its impact on clinical decision-making for individual patients were evaluated based on different biopsy trigger cutoffs. Results ECLIA-PSA was measured in 74 participants both pre- and 37 ± 5 min post-DRE, mean age 57.2 ± 8.3 years, and mean prostate volume 33.6 (20–80) cm 3 . Both total and free ECLIA-PSA increased significantly after DRE (mean increase of 0.47 and 0.26 ng/ml, respectively, both p  &lt; 0.001). Different internationally accepted biopsy triggers were reached after DRE only: 5 total PSA &gt; 3 ng/ml, 13 increase &gt; 0.75 ng/ml, 3 PSA density &gt; 0.15, and 1 free/total PSA &lt; 0.18. On two occasions, patients were pushed away from biopsy trigger after DRE due to free/total PSA &gt; 0.18. ICA-PSA was detectable (&gt; 2.0 ng/ml) in 5 of 45 measured samples (11%) before DRE and 13/45 (29%) after DRE, p  = 0.0316. Four among five detectable ICA-PSA tests increased after DRE. Conclusion Performing DRE immediately before PSA measurement might change the clinical decision-making on a significant number of occasions (roughly 1 in 3); even though the mean increase (0.47 ng/ml) looks deceivingly small. Further studies are required that include gold standard tests (biopsy, or imaging).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11255-022-03283-5</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2092-414X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1573-2584
ispartof International urology and nephrology, 2022-09, Vol.54 (9), p.2117-2123
issn 1573-2584
0301-1623
1573-2584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2685030106
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Biopsy
Chemiluminescence
Clinical decision making
Decision making
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Nephrology
Patients
Prostate
Prostate cancer
Rectum
Urology
Urology - Original Paper
title Digital rectal examination impact on PSA derivatives and prostate biopsy triggers: a contemporary study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T09%3A57%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Digital%20rectal%20examination%20impact%20on%20PSA%20derivatives%20and%20prostate%20biopsy%20triggers:%20a%20contemporary%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20urology%20and%20nephrology&rft.au=da%20Silva%20Junior,%20Maur%C3%ADcio%20Moreira&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2117&rft.epage=2123&rft.pages=2117-2123&rft.issn=1573-2584&rft.eissn=1573-2584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11255-022-03283-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2685030106%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2700908868&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true