Digital rectal examination impact on PSA derivatives and prostate biopsy triggers: a contemporary study
Objective To evaluate the impact of the digital rectal exam (DRE) on PSA measurements and clinical decision-making. Methods Healthy male volunteers between 50 and 70 years old were recruited during a 30-day public screening program. PSA levels were measured using two different methods (standard enha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International urology and nephrology 2022-09, Vol.54 (9), p.2117-2123 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To evaluate the impact of the digital rectal exam (DRE) on PSA measurements and clinical decision-making.
Methods
Healthy male volunteers between 50 and 70 years old were recruited during a 30-day public screening program. PSA levels were measured using two different methods (standard enhanced chemiluminescence immunoassay—ECLIA, and novel immunochromatography assay—ICA/rapid PSA) in the same blood sample. Two blood samples were drawn; first before DRE and the second 30–40 min after DRE. The effect of DRE on PSA levels and its impact on clinical decision-making for individual patients were evaluated based on different biopsy trigger cutoffs.
Results
ECLIA-PSA was measured in 74 participants both pre- and 37 ± 5 min post-DRE, mean age 57.2 ± 8.3 years, and mean prostate volume 33.6 (20–80) cm
3
. Both total and free ECLIA-PSA increased significantly after DRE (mean increase of 0.47 and 0.26 ng/ml, respectively, both
p
3 ng/ml, 13 increase > 0.75 ng/ml, 3 PSA density > 0.15, and 1 free/total PSA 0.18. ICA-PSA was detectable (> 2.0 ng/ml) in 5 of 45 measured samples (11%) before DRE and 13/45 (29%) after DRE,
p
= 0.0316. Four among five detectable ICA-PSA tests increased after DRE.
Conclusion
Performing DRE immediately before PSA measurement might change the clinical decision-making on a significant number of occasions (roughly 1 in 3); even though the mean increase (0.47 ng/ml) looks deceivingly small. Further studies are required that include gold standard tests (biopsy, or imaging). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-2584 0301-1623 1573-2584 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11255-022-03283-5 |