Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed bracket transfer tray using an in-office indirect bonding system

In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the bracket positioning accuracy of the indirect bonding (IDB) transfer tray fabricated in-clinic using the tray printing (TP) and marker-model printing methods (MP). The TP group was further divided into 2 groups (single-tray printing [STP] and multip...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2022-07, Vol.162 (1), p.93-102.e1
Hauptverfasser: Yoo, Seong-Hun, Choi, Sung-Hwan, Kim, Kwang-Mahn, Lee, Kee-Joon, Kim, Young-Jun, Yu, Jae-Hun, Choi, Yeong-Il, Cha, Jung-Yul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the bracket positioning accuracy of the indirect bonding (IDB) transfer tray fabricated in-clinic using the tray printing (TP) and marker-model printing methods (MP). The TP group was further divided into 2 groups (single-tray printing [STP] and multiple-tray printing [MTP]) depending on the presence of a tray split created using the 3-dimensional (3D) software. Five duplicated plaster models were used for each of the 3 experimental groups, and a total of 180 artificial teeth, except the second molar, were evaluated in the experiment. The dental model was scanned using a model scanner (E3; 3Shape Dental Systems, Copenhagen, Denmark). Virtual brackets were placed on facial axis points, and the IDB trays were designed and fabricated using a 3D printer (VIDA; EnvisionTEC, Mich). The accuracy of bracket positioning was evaluated by comparing the planned bracket positions and the actual bracket positions using 3D analysis on inspection software. The main effects and first-order interaction effects were analyzed together by analysis for the analysis of variance. The mean distance and height errors were significantly lower in the STP group than those in the MP and MTP groups (P 
ISSN:0889-5406
1097-6752
DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.025