Association of computed tomography scores to psychophysical measures of olfaction: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Background While various sinus computed tomography (CT) scoring systems have been proposed and used in the literature, no single system has been identified as superior. The strength of associations between CT scoring systems and measures of olfaction also remains unclear. Methods A systematic review...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International forum of allergy & rhinology 2023-02, Vol.13 (2), p.151-159
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Tiffany, Chidarala, Shreya, Young, Gabrielle, Jeong, Seth S., Nguyen, Shaun A., Edwards, Thomas S., Schlosser, Rodney J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background While various sinus computed tomography (CT) scoring systems have been proposed and used in the literature, no single system has been identified as superior. The strength of associations between CT scoring systems and measures of olfaction also remains unclear. Methods A systematic review of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines. Studies that reported both CT scores and measures of olfaction in a cross‐sectional manner were included. Results A total of 37 studies were eligible for meta‐analysis. Of 8035 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, 55.6% were male patients and 53.2% had chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Analysis by meta‐regression was performed of Lund‐Mackay (LM) versus Smell Identification Test‐40 (SIT‐40; 12 studies), Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT; 10 studies), Sniffin’ Sticks (SS; 10 studies), and Toyota & Takagi (T&T) olfactometry (four studies). A significant moderate association was found between LM and SIT‐40 (R2 = 0.612, p 
ISSN:2042-6976
2042-6984
DOI:10.1002/alr.23053