Factors related to the skin thickness of cardiovascular implantable electronic device pockets
Introduction The skin overlying cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) sometimes becomes very thin after implantations, which could cause a device erosion. The factors related to the skin thickness of device pockets have not been elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the skin thick...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2022-08, Vol.33 (8), p.1847-1856 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
The skin overlying cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) sometimes becomes very thin after implantations, which could cause a device erosion. The factors related to the skin thickness of device pockets have not been elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the skin thickness of CIED pockets and search for the factors associated with the thickness.
Methods
Seventeen skin thickness points around the CIED pocket were measured through ultrasonography in each patient.
Results
A total of 101 patients (76 ± 11 years, 26 female) were enrolled. The median duration from the implantation to the examination was 95 months (quartile: 52.5–147.5). The median skin thickness overlying the device was 4.1 mm (3.3–5.9). Patients with heart failure and malignancy had thinner skin overlying the CIED than those without. A significant correlation existed between skin thickness and body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and left ventricular ejection fraction. In contrast, age, gender, and device size did not exhibit a significant correlation with skin thickness. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that chronic heart failure and a decrease in the eGFR and BMI were independent predictive factors of “very thin (≦3.3 mm)” skin of the CIED pocket late after an implantation.
Conclusion
Aside from a low BMI, the comorbidities (low hemoglobin, heart failure, and renal dysfunction) had a stronger impact on the skin thickness overlying the device than the device size. A careful observation of the device pocket should be performed in patients with those risk factors. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1045-3873 1540-8167 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jce.15613 |