Quality assessment of Portuguese monofloral honeys. Physicochemical parameters as tools in botanical source differentiation
[Display omitted] •Fifty-one labelled monofloral honeys from the mainland Portugal, and Azores were analyzed.•Pollen analysis confirmed 28 honeys as monofloral, and 8 with predominance of a pollen type.•Microbiological quality assessment validated general safety of the fifty-one honeys.•Honeys were...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Food research international 2022-07, Vol.157, p.111362-111362, Article 111362 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 111362 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 111362 |
container_title | Food research international |
container_volume | 157 |
creator | Machado, Alexandra M. Tomás, Andreia Russo-Almeida, Paulo Duarte, Aida Antunes, Marília Vilas-Boas, Miguel Graça Miguel, M. Cristina Figueiredo, A. |
description | [Display omitted]
•Fifty-one labelled monofloral honeys from the mainland Portugal, and Azores were analyzed.•Pollen analysis confirmed 28 honeys as monofloral, and 8 with predominance of a pollen type.•Microbiological quality assessment validated general safety of the fifty-one honeys.•Honeys were analyzed and statistically studied for 10 physicochemical parameters (PP)•Electrical conductivity, colour index, acidity, and diastase were the most differentiating PP.
The quality evaluation and physicochemical parameters assessment of Portuguese monofloral honeys were performed. Fifty-one monofloral honeys were collected from several regions from mainland Portugal, and from the Azores islands, producer labelled as carob tree (n = 5), chestnut (n = 2), eucalyptus (n = 5), bell heather (n = 6), incense (n = 4), lavender (n = 8), orange (n = 9), rape (n = 2), raspberry (n = 2), rosemary (n = 1), sunflower (n = 3), and strawberry tree (n = 4). Pollen analysis and microbiological safety were evaluated, and the parameters such as colour index, moisture content, electrical conductivity, hydroxymethylfurfural, pH, free and total acidity, diastase activity, proline, and sugar profile were assessed for physicochemical characterization, in all 51 monofloral honeys. After melissopalynological examination, the honeys were either confirmed as monofloral, or classified as multifloral with predominance of a specific pollen type or multifloral. Microbiological analysis showed that honeys were safe for human consumption. Pairwise comparisons of physicochemical parameters, using only honey types with n ≥ 3, revealed significant differences between honey types. Despite some homogeneity in sugar profile among honeys, eucalyptus honey was significantly different in glucose, maltose and maltulose content compared to incense, orange and sunflower honeys, and also exhibited a higher isomaltose amount compared to all analyzed honeys. Electrical conductivity, colour index, free and total acidity, and diastase activity showed significant differences between the analyzed honeys, indicating that these parameters may provide an additional tool in monofloral honey identification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111362 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681813962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0963996922004197</els_id><sourcerecordid>2681813962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-dbb1698d23816a97d7c581cc50d8cb44490d10c442145e9bdb780cf9b54ff65f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE-L1TAUxYMo-Bz9CELcuWlN0iZNViKD_2DAEXQd0uTGl0fbPHPTgYdf3j47e1cXLr9zDucQ8pqzljOu3p3amHMogK1gQrSc806JJ-TA9dA1A-_lU3JgRnWNMco8Jy8QT4wxJQdzIH--r25K9UIdIiDOsFSaI73Ppa6_VkCgc15ynHJxEz3mBS7Y0vvjBZPP_ghz8tv_7IqboULBzYbWnCekaaFjrm75B2BeiwcaUoxQtojkasrLS_Isugnh1eO9IT8_ffxx-6W5-_b56-2Hu8b3XNYmjCNXRgfRaa6cGcLgpebeSxa0H_u-Nyxw5vtebFXBjGEcNPPRjLKPUcnY3ZC3u--55N9bp2rnhB6myS2QV7RCaa55Z5TYULmjvmTEAtGeS5pduVjO7HVse7KPY9vr2HYfe9O92XXFO3e2BR4SVodXidFWyEFemfc7A1vXhwTFok-weAipgK825PSflL_xiJkT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681813962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality assessment of Portuguese monofloral honeys. Physicochemical parameters as tools in botanical source differentiation</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Machado, Alexandra M. ; Tomás, Andreia ; Russo-Almeida, Paulo ; Duarte, Aida ; Antunes, Marília ; Vilas-Boas, Miguel ; Graça Miguel, M. ; Cristina Figueiredo, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Machado, Alexandra M. ; Tomás, Andreia ; Russo-Almeida, Paulo ; Duarte, Aida ; Antunes, Marília ; Vilas-Boas, Miguel ; Graça Miguel, M. ; Cristina Figueiredo, A.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Fifty-one labelled monofloral honeys from the mainland Portugal, and Azores were analyzed.•Pollen analysis confirmed 28 honeys as monofloral, and 8 with predominance of a pollen type.•Microbiological quality assessment validated general safety of the fifty-one honeys.•Honeys were analyzed and statistically studied for 10 physicochemical parameters (PP)•Electrical conductivity, colour index, acidity, and diastase were the most differentiating PP.
The quality evaluation and physicochemical parameters assessment of Portuguese monofloral honeys were performed. Fifty-one monofloral honeys were collected from several regions from mainland Portugal, and from the Azores islands, producer labelled as carob tree (n = 5), chestnut (n = 2), eucalyptus (n = 5), bell heather (n = 6), incense (n = 4), lavender (n = 8), orange (n = 9), rape (n = 2), raspberry (n = 2), rosemary (n = 1), sunflower (n = 3), and strawberry tree (n = 4). Pollen analysis and microbiological safety were evaluated, and the parameters such as colour index, moisture content, electrical conductivity, hydroxymethylfurfural, pH, free and total acidity, diastase activity, proline, and sugar profile were assessed for physicochemical characterization, in all 51 monofloral honeys. After melissopalynological examination, the honeys were either confirmed as monofloral, or classified as multifloral with predominance of a specific pollen type or multifloral. Microbiological analysis showed that honeys were safe for human consumption. Pairwise comparisons of physicochemical parameters, using only honey types with n ≥ 3, revealed significant differences between honey types. Despite some homogeneity in sugar profile among honeys, eucalyptus honey was significantly different in glucose, maltose and maltulose content compared to incense, orange and sunflower honeys, and also exhibited a higher isomaltose amount compared to all analyzed honeys. Electrical conductivity, colour index, free and total acidity, and diastase activity showed significant differences between the analyzed honeys, indicating that these parameters may provide an additional tool in monofloral honey identification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-9969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111362</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Botanical source ; Differentiation ; Physicochemical parameters ; Portuguese monofloral honeys</subject><ispartof>Food research international, 2022-07, Vol.157, p.111362-111362, Article 111362</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-dbb1698d23816a97d7c581cc50d8cb44490d10c442145e9bdb780cf9b54ff65f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-dbb1698d23816a97d7c581cc50d8cb44490d10c442145e9bdb780cf9b54ff65f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8665-5280</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111362$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machado, Alexandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomás, Andreia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo-Almeida, Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Aida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antunes, Marília</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilas-Boas, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graça Miguel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristina Figueiredo, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Quality assessment of Portuguese monofloral honeys. Physicochemical parameters as tools in botanical source differentiation</title><title>Food research international</title><description>[Display omitted]
•Fifty-one labelled monofloral honeys from the mainland Portugal, and Azores were analyzed.•Pollen analysis confirmed 28 honeys as monofloral, and 8 with predominance of a pollen type.•Microbiological quality assessment validated general safety of the fifty-one honeys.•Honeys were analyzed and statistically studied for 10 physicochemical parameters (PP)•Electrical conductivity, colour index, acidity, and diastase were the most differentiating PP.
The quality evaluation and physicochemical parameters assessment of Portuguese monofloral honeys were performed. Fifty-one monofloral honeys were collected from several regions from mainland Portugal, and from the Azores islands, producer labelled as carob tree (n = 5), chestnut (n = 2), eucalyptus (n = 5), bell heather (n = 6), incense (n = 4), lavender (n = 8), orange (n = 9), rape (n = 2), raspberry (n = 2), rosemary (n = 1), sunflower (n = 3), and strawberry tree (n = 4). Pollen analysis and microbiological safety were evaluated, and the parameters such as colour index, moisture content, electrical conductivity, hydroxymethylfurfural, pH, free and total acidity, diastase activity, proline, and sugar profile were assessed for physicochemical characterization, in all 51 monofloral honeys. After melissopalynological examination, the honeys were either confirmed as monofloral, or classified as multifloral with predominance of a specific pollen type or multifloral. Microbiological analysis showed that honeys were safe for human consumption. Pairwise comparisons of physicochemical parameters, using only honey types with n ≥ 3, revealed significant differences between honey types. Despite some homogeneity in sugar profile among honeys, eucalyptus honey was significantly different in glucose, maltose and maltulose content compared to incense, orange and sunflower honeys, and also exhibited a higher isomaltose amount compared to all analyzed honeys. Electrical conductivity, colour index, free and total acidity, and diastase activity showed significant differences between the analyzed honeys, indicating that these parameters may provide an additional tool in monofloral honey identification.</description><subject>Botanical source</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Physicochemical parameters</subject><subject>Portuguese monofloral honeys</subject><issn>0963-9969</issn><issn>1873-7145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE-L1TAUxYMo-Bz9CELcuWlN0iZNViKD_2DAEXQd0uTGl0fbPHPTgYdf3j47e1cXLr9zDucQ8pqzljOu3p3amHMogK1gQrSc806JJ-TA9dA1A-_lU3JgRnWNMco8Jy8QT4wxJQdzIH--r25K9UIdIiDOsFSaI73Ppa6_VkCgc15ynHJxEz3mBS7Y0vvjBZPP_ghz8tv_7IqboULBzYbWnCekaaFjrm75B2BeiwcaUoxQtojkasrLS_Isugnh1eO9IT8_ffxx-6W5-_b56-2Hu8b3XNYmjCNXRgfRaa6cGcLgpebeSxa0H_u-Nyxw5vtebFXBjGEcNPPRjLKPUcnY3ZC3u--55N9bp2rnhB6myS2QV7RCaa55Z5TYULmjvmTEAtGeS5pduVjO7HVse7KPY9vr2HYfe9O92XXFO3e2BR4SVodXidFWyEFemfc7A1vXhwTFok-weAipgK825PSflL_xiJkT</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Machado, Alexandra M.</creator><creator>Tomás, Andreia</creator><creator>Russo-Almeida, Paulo</creator><creator>Duarte, Aida</creator><creator>Antunes, Marília</creator><creator>Vilas-Boas, Miguel</creator><creator>Graça Miguel, M.</creator><creator>Cristina Figueiredo, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>RCLKO</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8665-5280</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Quality assessment of Portuguese monofloral honeys. Physicochemical parameters as tools in botanical source differentiation</title><author>Machado, Alexandra M. ; Tomás, Andreia ; Russo-Almeida, Paulo ; Duarte, Aida ; Antunes, Marília ; Vilas-Boas, Miguel ; Graça Miguel, M. ; Cristina Figueiredo, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-dbb1698d23816a97d7c581cc50d8cb44490d10c442145e9bdb780cf9b54ff65f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Botanical source</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Physicochemical parameters</topic><topic>Portuguese monofloral honeys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machado, Alexandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomás, Andreia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo-Almeida, Paulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Aida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antunes, Marília</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilas-Boas, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graça Miguel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristina Figueiredo, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>RCAAP open access repository</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Food research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machado, Alexandra M.</au><au>Tomás, Andreia</au><au>Russo-Almeida, Paulo</au><au>Duarte, Aida</au><au>Antunes, Marília</au><au>Vilas-Boas, Miguel</au><au>Graça Miguel, M.</au><au>Cristina Figueiredo, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality assessment of Portuguese monofloral honeys. Physicochemical parameters as tools in botanical source differentiation</atitle><jtitle>Food research international</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>157</volume><spage>111362</spage><epage>111362</epage><pages>111362-111362</pages><artnum>111362</artnum><issn>0963-9969</issn><eissn>1873-7145</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Fifty-one labelled monofloral honeys from the mainland Portugal, and Azores were analyzed.•Pollen analysis confirmed 28 honeys as monofloral, and 8 with predominance of a pollen type.•Microbiological quality assessment validated general safety of the fifty-one honeys.•Honeys were analyzed and statistically studied for 10 physicochemical parameters (PP)•Electrical conductivity, colour index, acidity, and diastase were the most differentiating PP.
The quality evaluation and physicochemical parameters assessment of Portuguese monofloral honeys were performed. Fifty-one monofloral honeys were collected from several regions from mainland Portugal, and from the Azores islands, producer labelled as carob tree (n = 5), chestnut (n = 2), eucalyptus (n = 5), bell heather (n = 6), incense (n = 4), lavender (n = 8), orange (n = 9), rape (n = 2), raspberry (n = 2), rosemary (n = 1), sunflower (n = 3), and strawberry tree (n = 4). Pollen analysis and microbiological safety were evaluated, and the parameters such as colour index, moisture content, electrical conductivity, hydroxymethylfurfural, pH, free and total acidity, diastase activity, proline, and sugar profile were assessed for physicochemical characterization, in all 51 monofloral honeys. After melissopalynological examination, the honeys were either confirmed as monofloral, or classified as multifloral with predominance of a specific pollen type or multifloral. Microbiological analysis showed that honeys were safe for human consumption. Pairwise comparisons of physicochemical parameters, using only honey types with n ≥ 3, revealed significant differences between honey types. Despite some homogeneity in sugar profile among honeys, eucalyptus honey was significantly different in glucose, maltose and maltulose content compared to incense, orange and sunflower honeys, and also exhibited a higher isomaltose amount compared to all analyzed honeys. Electrical conductivity, colour index, free and total acidity, and diastase activity showed significant differences between the analyzed honeys, indicating that these parameters may provide an additional tool in monofloral honey identification.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111362</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8665-5280</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-9969 |
ispartof | Food research international, 2022-07, Vol.157, p.111362-111362, Article 111362 |
issn | 0963-9969 1873-7145 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681813962 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Botanical source Differentiation Physicochemical parameters Portuguese monofloral honeys |
title | Quality assessment of Portuguese monofloral honeys. Physicochemical parameters as tools in botanical source differentiation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T19%3A44%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20assessment%20of%20Portuguese%20monofloral%20honeys.%20Physicochemical%20parameters%20as%20tools%20in%20botanical%20source%20differentiation&rft.jtitle=Food%20research%20international&rft.au=Machado,%20Alexandra%20M.&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=157&rft.spage=111362&rft.epage=111362&rft.pages=111362-111362&rft.artnum=111362&rft.issn=0963-9969&rft.eissn=1873-7145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111362&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681813962%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681813962&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0963996922004197&rfr_iscdi=true |