Quality assessment of Portuguese monofloral honeys. Physicochemical parameters as tools in botanical source differentiation

[Display omitted] •Fifty-one labelled monofloral honeys from the mainland Portugal, and Azores were analyzed.•Pollen analysis confirmed 28 honeys as monofloral, and 8 with predominance of a pollen type.•Microbiological quality assessment validated general safety of the fifty-one honeys.•Honeys were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food research international 2022-07, Vol.157, p.111362-111362, Article 111362
Hauptverfasser: Machado, Alexandra M., Tomás, Andreia, Russo-Almeida, Paulo, Duarte, Aida, Antunes, Marília, Vilas-Boas, Miguel, Graça Miguel, M., Cristina Figueiredo, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •Fifty-one labelled monofloral honeys from the mainland Portugal, and Azores were analyzed.•Pollen analysis confirmed 28 honeys as monofloral, and 8 with predominance of a pollen type.•Microbiological quality assessment validated general safety of the fifty-one honeys.•Honeys were analyzed and statistically studied for 10 physicochemical parameters (PP)•Electrical conductivity, colour index, acidity, and diastase were the most differentiating PP. The quality evaluation and physicochemical parameters assessment of Portuguese monofloral honeys were performed. Fifty-one monofloral honeys were collected from several regions from mainland Portugal, and from the Azores islands, producer labelled as carob tree (n = 5), chestnut (n = 2), eucalyptus (n = 5), bell heather (n = 6), incense (n = 4), lavender (n = 8), orange (n = 9), rape (n = 2), raspberry (n = 2), rosemary (n = 1), sunflower (n = 3), and strawberry tree (n = 4). Pollen analysis and microbiological safety were evaluated, and the parameters such as colour index, moisture content, electrical conductivity, hydroxymethylfurfural, pH, free and total acidity, diastase activity, proline, and sugar profile were assessed for physicochemical characterization, in all 51 monofloral honeys. After melissopalynological examination, the honeys were either confirmed as monofloral, or classified as multifloral with predominance of a specific pollen type or multifloral. Microbiological analysis showed that honeys were safe for human consumption. Pairwise comparisons of physicochemical parameters, using only honey types with n ≥ 3, revealed significant differences between honey types. Despite some homogeneity in sugar profile among honeys, eucalyptus honey was significantly different in glucose, maltose and maltulose content compared to incense, orange and sunflower honeys, and also exhibited a higher isomaltose amount compared to all analyzed honeys. Electrical conductivity, colour index, free and total acidity, and diastase activity showed significant differences between the analyzed honeys, indicating that these parameters may provide an additional tool in monofloral honey identification.
ISSN:0963-9969
1873-7145
DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111362