Cell–cell communication inference and analysis in the tumour microenvironments from single-cell transcriptomics: data resources and computational strategies

Abstract Carcinomas are complex ecosystems composed of cancer, stromal and immune cells. Communication between these cells and their microenvironments induces cancer progression and causes therapy resistance. In order to improve the treatment of cancers, it is essential to quantify crosstalk between...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Briefings in bioinformatics 2022-07, Vol.23 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Peng, Lihong, Wang, Feixiang, Wang, Zhao, Tan, Jingwei, Huang, Li, Tian, Xiongfei, Liu, Guangyi, Zhou, Liqian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Carcinomas are complex ecosystems composed of cancer, stromal and immune cells. Communication between these cells and their microenvironments induces cancer progression and causes therapy resistance. In order to improve the treatment of cancers, it is essential to quantify crosstalk between and within various cell types in a tumour microenvironment. Focusing on the coordinated expression patterns of ligands and cognate receptors, cell–cell communication can be inferred through ligand–receptor interactions (LRIs). In this manuscript, we carry out the following work: (i) introduce pipeline for ligand–receptor-mediated intercellular communication estimation from single-cell transcriptomics and list a few available LRI-related databases and visualization tools; (ii) demonstrate seven classical intercellular communication scoring strategies, highlight four types of representative intercellular communication inference methods, including network-based approaches, machine learning-based approaches, spatial information-based approaches and other approaches; (iii) summarize the evaluation and validation avenues for intercellular communication inference and analyze the advantages and limitations for the above four types of cell–cell communication methods; (iv) comment several major challenges while provide further research directions for intercellular communication analysis in the tumour microenvironments. We anticipate that this work helps to better understand intercellular crosstalk and to further develop powerful cell–cell communication estimation tools for tumor-targeted therapy.
ISSN:1467-5463
1477-4054
DOI:10.1093/bib/bbac234