The impact of recall timing on the preservation of eyewitness memory
Two studies investigated the impact of recall timing on eyewitness memory. In Study 1, participants viewed a crime video and then completed the Self-Administered Interview (SAI) either immediately, after a 24-h delay, after a 1-week delay, or not at all. All participants completed a final recall que...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychiatry, psychology, and law psychology, and law, 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.471-486 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 486 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 471 |
| container_title | Psychiatry, psychology, and law |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Chevroulet, Chantal Paterson, Helen M. Yu, Angus Chew, Emily Kemp, Richard I. |
| description | Two studies investigated the impact of recall timing on eyewitness memory. In Study 1, participants viewed a crime video and then completed the Self-Administered Interview (SAI) either immediately, after a 24-h delay, after a 1-week delay, or not at all. All participants completed a final recall questionnaire 2 weeks after they had viewed the stimulus video. Study 2 aimed to determine how long the beneficial impact of the SAI on witnesses' long-term memory lasts. Participants watched a crime video and then either completed the SAI or did not engage in an immediate recall attempt. Participants then completed a final recall questionnaire after a delay of 24 h, 1 week, 2 weeks, or 1 month. The results indicated that initial recall should be completed within 24 h of an incident and that under these conditions, the beneficial impact of early recall on long-term memory endures for at least 1 month. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13218719.2021.1926366 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681440619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20220622069239</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2681440619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-6a7f92d82579543c47bc052a90fdddd039e484245477556fa9f48cd8885e63943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkU2LFDEQhoMo7u7oTxAavHjpMd-dXERZdVdYEGE9h2y6eiZDujMmmV3m35u2R1EPHgyEhNRbT6rqRegFwWuCFX5NGCWqI3pNMSVroqlkUj5C50Qz3hKpusf1XjXtLDpDFznvMCaaKPwUnTHRCdlhfY7e326h8ePeutLEoUngbAhN8aOfNk2cmlLD-wQZ0r0tvj5UERzhwZcJcm5GGGM6PkNPBhsyPD-dK_T144fby-v25vPVp8t3N62ThJZW2m7QtFdUdFpw5nh357CgVuOhrwszDVxxygXvOiHkYPXAleuVUgIk05yt0JuFuz_cjdA7mEqyweyTH206mmi9-TMy-a3ZxHujaf0Tkwp4dQKk-O0AuZjRZwch2AniIRsqFeEcyzrEFXr5l3QXD2mq7VWVJkRwQVVViUXlUsw5wfCrGILN7JP56ZOZfTInn2relyUvjb4YF0MAN48372zJJoNNbmv8NMQf8Zg2po9-ZjJGpLEbn_dlJlIs560pmyu-_o150vwv6u2CWvLsQ0yhN8UeQ0xDspPz2bB_d_gdGLbMgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691154528</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of recall timing on the preservation of eyewitness memory</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chevroulet, Chantal ; Paterson, Helen M. ; Yu, Angus ; Chew, Emily ; Kemp, Richard I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chevroulet, Chantal ; Paterson, Helen M. ; Yu, Angus ; Chew, Emily ; Kemp, Richard I.</creatorcontrib><description>Two studies investigated the impact of recall timing on eyewitness memory. In Study 1, participants viewed a crime video and then completed the Self-Administered Interview (SAI) either immediately, after a 24-h delay, after a 1-week delay, or not at all. All participants completed a final recall questionnaire 2 weeks after they had viewed the stimulus video. Study 2 aimed to determine how long the beneficial impact of the SAI on witnesses' long-term memory lasts. Participants watched a crime video and then either completed the SAI or did not engage in an immediate recall attempt. Participants then completed a final recall questionnaire after a delay of 24 h, 1 week, 2 weeks, or 1 month. The results indicated that initial recall should be completed within 24 h of an incident and that under these conditions, the beneficial impact of early recall on long-term memory endures for at least 1 month.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1321-8719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-1687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1926366</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35756709</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: Routledge</publisher><subject>Crime ; delay ; Eyewitness identification ; eyewitness memory ; eyewitness testimony ; guided recall ; Interviews ; Long term memory ; Memory ; Preservation ; Questionnaires ; Recall ; self-administered interview ; Stimulus ; Witnesses</subject><ispartof>Psychiatry, psychology, and law, 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.471-486</ispartof><rights>2021 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 2021</rights><rights>2021 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law</rights><rights>2021 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 2021 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-6a7f92d82579543c47bc052a90fdddd039e484245477556fa9f48cd8885e63943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-6a7f92d82579543c47bc052a90fdddd039e484245477556fa9f48cd8885e63943</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9283-4349</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225701/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9225701/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,30999,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chevroulet, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Helen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Angus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Richard I.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of recall timing on the preservation of eyewitness memory</title><title>Psychiatry, psychology, and law</title><description>Two studies investigated the impact of recall timing on eyewitness memory. In Study 1, participants viewed a crime video and then completed the Self-Administered Interview (SAI) either immediately, after a 24-h delay, after a 1-week delay, or not at all. All participants completed a final recall questionnaire 2 weeks after they had viewed the stimulus video. Study 2 aimed to determine how long the beneficial impact of the SAI on witnesses' long-term memory lasts. Participants watched a crime video and then either completed the SAI or did not engage in an immediate recall attempt. Participants then completed a final recall questionnaire after a delay of 24 h, 1 week, 2 weeks, or 1 month. The results indicated that initial recall should be completed within 24 h of an incident and that under these conditions, the beneficial impact of early recall on long-term memory endures for at least 1 month.</description><subject>Crime</subject><subject>delay</subject><subject>Eyewitness identification</subject><subject>eyewitness memory</subject><subject>eyewitness testimony</subject><subject>guided recall</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Long term memory</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>self-administered interview</subject><subject>Stimulus</subject><subject>Witnesses</subject><issn>1321-8719</issn><issn>1934-1687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkU2LFDEQhoMo7u7oTxAavHjpMd-dXERZdVdYEGE9h2y6eiZDujMmmV3m35u2R1EPHgyEhNRbT6rqRegFwWuCFX5NGCWqI3pNMSVroqlkUj5C50Qz3hKpusf1XjXtLDpDFznvMCaaKPwUnTHRCdlhfY7e326h8ePeutLEoUngbAhN8aOfNk2cmlLD-wQZ0r0tvj5UERzhwZcJcm5GGGM6PkNPBhsyPD-dK_T144fby-v25vPVp8t3N62ThJZW2m7QtFdUdFpw5nh357CgVuOhrwszDVxxygXvOiHkYPXAleuVUgIk05yt0JuFuz_cjdA7mEqyweyTH206mmi9-TMy-a3ZxHujaf0Tkwp4dQKk-O0AuZjRZwch2AniIRsqFeEcyzrEFXr5l3QXD2mq7VWVJkRwQVVViUXlUsw5wfCrGILN7JP56ZOZfTInn2relyUvjb4YF0MAN48372zJJoNNbmv8NMQf8Zg2po9-ZjJGpLEbn_dlJlIs560pmyu-_o150vwv6u2CWvLsQ0yhN8UeQ0xDspPz2bB_d_gdGLbMgQ</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Chevroulet, Chantal</creator><creator>Paterson, Helen M.</creator><creator>Yu, Angus</creator><creator>Chew, Emily</creator><creator>Kemp, Richard I.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Australian Academic Press Group Pty Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9283-4349</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>The impact of recall timing on the preservation of eyewitness memory</title><author>Chevroulet, Chantal ; Paterson, Helen M. ; Yu, Angus ; Chew, Emily ; Kemp, Richard I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c612t-6a7f92d82579543c47bc052a90fdddd039e484245477556fa9f48cd8885e63943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Crime</topic><topic>delay</topic><topic>Eyewitness identification</topic><topic>eyewitness memory</topic><topic>eyewitness testimony</topic><topic>guided recall</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Long term memory</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>self-administered interview</topic><topic>Stimulus</topic><topic>Witnesses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chevroulet, Chantal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paterson, Helen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Angus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Richard I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Psychiatry, psychology, and law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chevroulet, Chantal</au><au>Paterson, Helen M.</au><au>Yu, Angus</au><au>Chew, Emily</au><au>Kemp, Richard I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of recall timing on the preservation of eyewitness memory</atitle><jtitle>Psychiatry, psychology, and law</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>486</epage><pages>471-486</pages><issn>1321-8719</issn><eissn>1934-1687</eissn><abstract>Two studies investigated the impact of recall timing on eyewitness memory. In Study 1, participants viewed a crime video and then completed the Self-Administered Interview (SAI) either immediately, after a 24-h delay, after a 1-week delay, or not at all. All participants completed a final recall questionnaire 2 weeks after they had viewed the stimulus video. Study 2 aimed to determine how long the beneficial impact of the SAI on witnesses' long-term memory lasts. Participants watched a crime video and then either completed the SAI or did not engage in an immediate recall attempt. Participants then completed a final recall questionnaire after a delay of 24 h, 1 week, 2 weeks, or 1 month. The results indicated that initial recall should be completed within 24 h of an incident and that under these conditions, the beneficial impact of early recall on long-term memory endures for at least 1 month.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><pmid>35756709</pmid><doi>10.1080/13218719.2021.1926366</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9283-4349</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1321-8719 |
| ispartof | Psychiatry, psychology, and law, 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.471-486 |
| issn | 1321-8719 1934-1687 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2681440619 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); PubMed Central |
| subjects | Crime delay Eyewitness identification eyewitness memory eyewitness testimony guided recall Interviews Long term memory Memory Preservation Questionnaires Recall self-administered interview Stimulus Witnesses |
| title | The impact of recall timing on the preservation of eyewitness memory |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A18%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20recall%20timing%20on%20the%20preservation%20of%20eyewitness%20memory&rft.jtitle=Psychiatry,%20psychology,%20and%20law&rft.au=Chevroulet,%20Chantal&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=486&rft.pages=471-486&rft.issn=1321-8719&rft.eissn=1934-1687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13218719.2021.1926366&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681440619%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691154528&rft_id=info:pmid/35756709&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20220622069239&rfr_iscdi=true |