The impact of recall timing on the preservation of eyewitness memory
Two studies investigated the impact of recall timing on eyewitness memory. In Study 1, participants viewed a crime video and then completed the Self-Administered Interview (SAI) either immediately, after a 24-h delay, after a 1-week delay, or not at all. All participants completed a final recall que...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychiatry, psychology, and law psychology, and law, 2022-06, Vol.29 (3), p.471-486 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Two studies investigated the impact of recall timing on eyewitness memory. In Study 1, participants viewed a crime video and then completed the Self-Administered Interview (SAI) either immediately, after a 24-h delay, after a 1-week delay, or not at all. All participants completed a final recall questionnaire 2 weeks after they had viewed the stimulus video. Study 2 aimed to determine how long the beneficial impact of the SAI on witnesses' long-term memory lasts. Participants watched a crime video and then either completed the SAI or did not engage in an immediate recall attempt. Participants then completed a final recall questionnaire after a delay of 24 h, 1 week, 2 weeks, or 1 month. The results indicated that initial recall should be completed within 24 h of an incident and that under these conditions, the beneficial impact of early recall on long-term memory endures for at least 1 month. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1321-8719 1934-1687 |
DOI: | 10.1080/13218719.2021.1926366 |