Automated bone healing evaluation: New approach to histomorphometric analysis

This study aimed to assess different approaches for bone healing evaluation on histological images and to introduce a new automatic evaluation method based on segmentation with distinct thresholds. We evaluated the hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) effects on bone repair in type 1 diabetes mellitus ra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microscopy research and technique 2022-10, Vol.85 (10), p.3339-3346
Hauptverfasser: Linhares, Camila Rodrigues Borges, Rabelo, Gustavo Davi, Limirio, Pedro Henrique Justino Oliveira, Venâncio, Jessyca Figueira, Ribeiro Silva, Igor Gonçalves, Dechichi, Paula
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to assess different approaches for bone healing evaluation on histological images and to introduce a new automatic evaluation method based on segmentation with distinct thresholds. We evaluated the hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) effects on bone repair in type 1 diabetes mellitus rats. Twelve animals were divided into four groups (n = 3): non‐diabetic, non‐diabetic + HBO, diabetic, and diabetic + HBO. Diabetes was induced by intravenous administration of streptozotocin (50 mg/kg). Bone defects were created in femurs and HBO was immediately started at one session/day. After 7 days, the animals were euthanized, femurs were removed, demineralized, and embedded in paraffin. Histological sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and Mallory's trichrome (MT), and evaluated using three approaches: (1) conventional histomorphometric analysis (HE images) using a 144‐point grid to quantify the bone matrix; (2) a semi‐automatic method based on bone matrix segmentation to assess the bone matrix percentage (MT images); and (3) automatic approach, with the creation of a plug‐in for ImageJ software. The time required to perform the analysis in each method was measured and subjected to Bland–Altman statistical analysis. All three methods were satisfactory for measuring bone formation and were not statistically different. The automatic approach reduced the working time compared to visual grid and semi‐automated method (p 
ISSN:1059-910X
1097-0029
DOI:10.1002/jemt.24188