Robotic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Recipients: Results from a Multicenter Series

Robotic prostatectomy is safe and feasible in patients with a renal transplant. Oncological and functional results and complications seem to be similar to those for patients without a renal transplant, with no cases of graft injury being described. Despite an expected increase in prostate cancer (PC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 2022-12, Vol.82 (6), p.639-645
Hauptverfasser: Marra, Giancarlo, Agnello, Marco, Giordano, Andrea, Soria, Francesco, Oderda, Marco, Dariane, Charles, Timsit, Marc-Olivier, Branchereau, Julien, Hedli, Oussama, Mesnard, Benoit, Tilki, Derya, Olsburgh, Jonathon, Kulkarni, Meghana, Kasivisvanathan, Veeru, Breda, Alberto, Biancone, Luigi, Gontero, Paolo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Robotic prostatectomy is safe and feasible in patients with a renal transplant. Oncological and functional results and complications seem to be similar to those for patients without a renal transplant, with no cases of graft injury being described. Despite an expected increase in prostate cancer (PCa) incidence in the renal transplant recipient (RTR) population in the near future, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in these patients has been poorly detailed. It is not well understood whether results are comparable to RARP in the non-RTR setting. To describe the surgical technique for RARP in RTR and report results from our multi-institutional experience. This was a retrospective review of the experience of four referral centers. Transperitoneal RARP with pelvic lymph node dissection in selected patients. We measured patient, PCa, and graft baseline features; intraoperative and postoperative parameters; complications, (Clavien classification); and oncological and functional outcomes. We included 41 men. The median age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preoperative renal function, and prostate-specific antigen were 60 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 57–64), 2 points (IQR 2–3), 45 ml/min (IQR 30–62), and 6.5 ng/ml (IQR 5.2–10.2), respectively. Four men (9.8%) had a biopsy Gleason score >7. The majority of the patients (70.7%) did not undergo lymphadenectomy. The median operating time, hospital stay, and catheterization time were 201 min (IQR 170–250), 4 d (IQR 2–6), and 10 d (IQR 7–13), respectively. At final pathology, 11 men had extraprostatic extension and seven had positive surgical margins. At median follow-up of 42 mo (IQR 24–65), four men had biochemical recurrence, including one case of local PCa persistence and one local recurrence. No metastases were recorded while two patients died from non–PCa-related causes. Continence was preserved in 86.1% (p not applicable) and erections in 64.7% (p = 0.0633) of those who were continent/potent before the procedure. Renal function remained unchanged (p = 0.08). No intraoperative complications and one major (Clavien 3a) complication were recorded. RARP in RTR is safe and feasible. Overall, operative, oncological, and functional outcomes are comparable to those described for the non-RTR setting, with graft injury remaining undescribed. Further research is needed to confirm our findings. Robot-assisted removal of the prostate is safe and feasible in patients who have a kidney transplant. Cancer
ISSN:0302-2838
1873-7560
DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.024