The burden of illness of patients with paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria receiving C5 inhibitors in France, Germany and the United Kingdom: Patient‐reported insights on symptoms and quality of life
Objectives To assess the clinical, humanistic and economic burden of paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) among C5 inhibitor (C5i)‐treated patients with PNH. Methods This was a web‐based, cross‐sectional survey (01FEB2021‐31MAR2021) of adults with PNH treated with eculizumab (France, Germany,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of haematology 2022-10, Vol.109 (4), p.351-363 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
To assess the clinical, humanistic and economic burden of paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) among C5 inhibitor (C5i)‐treated patients with PNH.
Methods
This was a web‐based, cross‐sectional survey (01FEB2021‐31MAR2021) of adults with PNH treated with eculizumab (France, Germany, United Kingdom) or ravulizumab (Germany). Self‐reported outcomes included: patient characteristics; patient‐reported symptoms; and standardised patient‐reported outcomes (e.g. Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [FACIT]‐Fatigue, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 [EORTC QLQ‐C30]).
Results
Among 71 included patients, 98.6% were C5i‐treated for ≥3 months (88.7% ≥12 months); among those with self‐reported haemoglobin (Hb) levels (n = 63), most (85.7%) were anaemic (defined as ≤12.0 g/dL). Fatigue was the most common symptom at both diagnosis (73.2%) and survey time (63.4%); there were no statistically significant differences in symptom prevalence between treatment subgroups (eculizumab vs. ravulizumab). Total FACIT‐Fatigue and EORTC QLQ‐C30 scores were substantially lower than European general population references, but there were no statistically significant differences between treatment subgroups. Hb‐level subgroups ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0902-4441 1600-0609 1600-0609 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ejh.13816 |