The association between carotid flow time and fluid responsiveness in children under general anesthesia

Background Fluid administration in children undergoing surgery requires precision, however, determining fluid responsiveness can be challenging. Ultrasound has been used widely in the emergency department and intensive care units as a noninvasive, bedside manner of determining volume status, but the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric anesthesia 2022-09, Vol.32 (9), p.1047-1053
Hauptverfasser: Lin, Elaina E., Glau, Christie, Conlon, Thomas W., Chen, Aaron E., Kaplan, Summer L., Posada, Adriana, Nishisaki, Akira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Fluid administration in children undergoing surgery requires precision, however, determining fluid responsiveness can be challenging. Ultrasound has been used widely in the emergency department and intensive care units as a noninvasive, bedside manner of determining volume status, but the intraoperative period presents unique challenges as often the chest and abdomen are inaccessible for ultrasound. We investigate whether carotid artery ultrasound, specifically carotid flow time, can be used to determine fluid responsiveness in children under general anesthesia. Methods Prospective observational study of 87 children ages 1–12 years who were scheduled for elective noncardiac surgery. Ultrasound of the carotid artery and heart was performed at three time points: (1) after inhalational induction of anesthesia with the subject spontaneously breathing, (2) during positive pressure ventilation through endotracheal tube or supraglottic airway with tidal volume set at 8 ml/kg with PEEP of 10 cmH2O, and (3) after a 10 ml/kg fluid bolus. Carotid flow time and cardiac output were measured from saved images. Results Corrected carotid flow time (FTc) increased with initiation of positive pressure ventilation in both fluid responders and nonresponders (352.7 vs. 365.3 msec, p = .005 in fluid responders; 348.3 vs. 365.2 msec, p = .001 in nonresponders). FTc increased after fluid bolus in both responders and nonresponders (365.3 vs. 397.6 msec, p 
ISSN:1155-5645
1460-9592
DOI:10.1111/pan.14510