Inferences of SPECT renal dynamic imaging injection quality based on lung and abdominal aorta imaging features

Objective To analyze the characteristics of blood flow perfusion images at different injection levels to establish an evaluation standard for renal dynamic imaging injection quality and reduce misdiagnosis. Methods Data from 140 single-photon emission computed tomography renal dynamic imaging, colle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of nuclear medicine 2022-08, Vol.36 (8), p.710-716
Hauptverfasser: Li, Jicheng, Huang, Lele, Luo, Yongjun, Zhang, Kai, Wang, Jianyin, Feng, Jianzhong, Liu, Jiangyan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To analyze the characteristics of blood flow perfusion images at different injection levels to establish an evaluation standard for renal dynamic imaging injection quality and reduce misdiagnosis. Methods Data from 140 single-photon emission computed tomography renal dynamic imaging, collected in our hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. The scans were divided into four groups according to the injection quality: total leakage of the imaging agent (group A), partial leakage (group B), poor bolus injection quality (group C), and good bolus injection quality (group D). The time of appearance and regression of the pulmonary blood perfusion phase, the peak time in the abdominal aorta, and the ratio between peak count and actual drug injection count were analyzed. The renal dynamic imaging was repeated in low-quality examinations, and the comparison between the two exams provided the misdiagnosis rate caused by inadequate injections. Results The images of the lungs and abdominal aorta in group A were blurred and indistinguishable; thus, these exams were unreliable. Both appearance and fading time of the bilateral lung shadows were significantly different between groups B, C, and D ( p  = 0.002 and p  = 0.003, respectively). The peak time and peak counting ratio in the abdominal aorta were also significantly different between these groups ( p  = 0.002 and p  
ISSN:0914-7187
1864-6433
DOI:10.1007/s12149-022-01750-8