Identification of upper GI diseases during screening gastroscopy using a deep convolutional neural network algorithm

The clinical application of GI endoscopy for the diagnosis of multiple diseases using artificial intelligence (AI) has been limited by its high false-positive rates. There is an unmet need to develop a GI endoscopy AI-assisted diagnosis system (GEADS) to improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical util...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2022-11, Vol.96 (5), p.787-795.e6
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Hang, Wu, Yu, Yang, Bo, Wu, Min, Zhou, Jun, Liu, Qin, Lin, Yifei, Li, Shilin, Li, Xue, Zhang, Jie, Wang, Rui, Xie, Qianrong, Li, Jingqi, Luo, Yue, Tu, Mengjie, Wang, Xiao, Lan, Haitao, Bai, Xuesong, Wu, Huaping, Zeng, Fanwei, Zhao, Hong, Yi, Zhang, Zeng, Fanxin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The clinical application of GI endoscopy for the diagnosis of multiple diseases using artificial intelligence (AI) has been limited by its high false-positive rates. There is an unmet need to develop a GI endoscopy AI-assisted diagnosis system (GEADS) to improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. In this retrospective, multicenter study, a convolutional neural network was trained to assess upper GI diseases based on 26,228 endoscopic images from Dazhou Central Hospital that were randomly assigned (3:1:1) to a training dataset, validation dataset, and test dataset, respectively. To validate the model, 6 external independent datasets comprising 51,372 images of upper GI diseases were collected. In addition, 1 prospective dataset comprising 27,975 images was collected. The performance of GEADS was compared with endoscopists with 2 professional degrees of expertise: expert and novice. Eight endoscopists were in the expert group with >5 years of experience, whereas 3 endoscopists were in the novice group with 1 to 5 years of experience. The GEADS model achieved an accuracy of .918 (95% confidence interval [CI], .914-.922), with an F1 score of .884 (95% CI, .879-.889), recall of .873 (95% CI, .868-.878), and precision of .890 (95% CI, .885-.895) in the internal validation dataset. In the external validation datasets and 1 prospective validation dataset, the diagnostic accuracy of the GEADS ranged from .841 (95% CI, .834-.848) to .949 (95% CI, .935-.963). With the help of the GEADS, the diagnosing accuracies of novice and expert endoscopists were significantly improved (P < .001). The AI system can assist endoscopists in improving the accuracy of diagnosing upper GI diseases.
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2022.06.011