Outpatient hysteroscopy is effective for uterine cavity evaluation following failed office‐based endometrial biopsy
Background Failure to obtain an office‐based endometrial biopsy for abnormal uterine bleeding is not uncommon. Although operating room‐based procedures are traditionally considered the gold standard assessment tool in these circumstances, outpatient hysteroscopy is a less invasive, more cost‐effecti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research 2022-09, Vol.48 (9), p.2452-2458 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Failure to obtain an office‐based endometrial biopsy for abnormal uterine bleeding is not uncommon. Although operating room‐based procedures are traditionally considered the gold standard assessment tool in these circumstances, outpatient hysteroscopy is a less invasive, more cost‐effective, and safer alternative. However, there is no contemporary Canadian literature on the effectiveness of an outpatient approach for this specific population.
Objective
We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of outpatient hysteroscopy for uterine cavity evaluation for patients who have failed an in‐office endometrial biopsy attempt.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients referred to an academic outpatient hysteroscopy unit between January 2015 and January 2018, who underwent an outpatient hysteroscopy following failed endometrial biopsy. Data were collected from electronic medical records.
Results
Of the 407 consecutive patients who underwent an outpatient hysteroscopic procedure, 68 met inclusion criteria. Postmenopausal bleeding was the most common indication for initial biopsy, and most failures were attributed to cervical stenosis. Outpatient hysteroscopies were successfully completed in 96% of cases (n = 65/68). Failure resulted from either anxiety and discomfort (n = 2), or severe intrauterine adhesions (n = 1). Overall, 10% of patients subsequently required an operating room‐based hysteroscopy, either to complete a myomectomy or polypectomy, or to allow general anesthesia. Outpatient hysteroscopy identified endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in 4.5% and 3% of patients, respectively.
Conclusion
Outpatient hysteroscopy following unsuccessful office endometrial biopsy attempts appears to be a feasible, safe, and cost‐effective investigation strategy that may prevent the need for an operating room‐based procedure in 90% of cases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1341-8076 1447-0756 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jog.15329 |