Patterns in Academic Cosmetic Surgery Practice: Population Differences and Procedure Preferences

Although growth in cosmetic surgery remains constant in the private setting, academic cosmetic surgery practices are often underdeveloped. Our study aims to determine which patient populations access academic cosmetic surgery services. The 2018 Health Care Utilization Project Nationwide Ambulatory S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2022-06, Vol.88 (5 Suppl 5), p.S490-S494
Hauptverfasser: Moore, Reece, Zilinskas, Kasparas, Tarabishy, Sami, Herrera, Fernando Antonio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although growth in cosmetic surgery remains constant in the private setting, academic cosmetic surgery practices are often underdeveloped. Our study aims to determine which patient populations access academic cosmetic surgery services. The 2018 Health Care Utilization Project Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample database was used for data analysis. Encounters for the following American Society of Plastic Surgery top 5 procedures for 2020 were selected: blepharoplasty, breast augmentation, liposuction, rhinoplasty, and rhytidectomy. Patient encounter data were collected because it relates to median income, geographic location, and primary payer status. The 2018 Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample data set contained 44,078 encounters at academic surgical centers for the procedures listed previously. Low-income patients account for 13.7% of academic cosmetic surgery encounters compared with 37.9% for high-income patients. Breast augmentation rates are higher among low-income patients (20.5% vs 17.2%, P < 0.001), and high-income patients undergo rhytidectomy more frequently (5.7% vs 3.0%, P < 0.001). In the academic setting, patients from large metropolitan areas encompass the majority of cosmetic encounters (71.0%), and these patients are more likely to proceed with rhinoplasty, rhytidectomy, and liposuction procedures (P < 0.001). Patients from smaller metropolitan areas undergo blepharoplasty more frequently compared with those from larger metropolitan areas (56.4% vs 41.8%, P < 0.001). Self-pay and privately insured patients comprise the majority of academic cosmetic surgery encounters (40.8% and 29.9%, respectively). Eighty-eight percent of Medicare patients within this cohort underwent blepharoplasty, whereas self-pay patients accessed breast augmentation, liposuction, and rhytidectomy more often than other insured patients. Income status, patient location, and primary payer status play an important role in academic cosmetic surgery access rates and procedure preferences. Academic cosmetic practices can use these insights to tailor their services to the populations they serve.
ISSN:0148-7043
1536-3708
DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003159